SynthesisFrontiers in neurology2025
Determining the efficacy and safety of acupuncture for the treatment of menstrual migraine: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Electroacupuncture for Menstrual-Related Migraine: Protocol for a Multicenter Single-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial.Pain research & management · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Menstrual migraine (MM) is a common type of headache linked to hormonal fluctuations during the menstrual cycle, remains challenging to treat due to the limited efficacy of current therapies. While acupuncture shows potential as a therapeutic option for MM, the existing evidence does not clearly support its routine clinical use. This protocol for a systematic review (SR) and meta-analysis seeks to gather and evaluate recent clinical evidence regarding the effectiveness and safety of acupuncture in treating MM. Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted across multiple databases from their inception to April 2025, including PubMed, Medline, Ovid, Embase, ScienceDirect, the Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang, the Chinese Biomedical Literature (CBM) database, and the VIP Database. This was complemented by regular updates from trial registries such as the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP), which target unpublished and ongoing randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Eligible studies were RCTs comparing acupuncture with Western medicine, herbal remedies, sham acupuncture, or no intervention for the management of MM. Primary outcomes included the pain intensity [Visual Analog Scale (VAS)], the frequency of migraine attacks (FM), and duration of migraine (DM). Secondary outcomes encompassed response rate, Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6), the Menstrual Headache Index (MHI), the serum levels of 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT), and adverse events. Analyses involved meta-analysis, subgroup comparisons, publication bias detection, sensitivity testing, risk-of-bias evaluations, and profiling of adverse events. The quality of evidence was judged according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria. Results: A total of 39 RCTs comprising 2,584 participants were included. Compared with control interventions, acupuncture significantly reduced VAS scores, decreased the frequency and duration of migraine attacks, and improved response rates, as well as HIT-6 and MHI scores. Additionally, acupuncture was associated with increased serum 5-HT levels. Meta-analytic findings indicated that acupuncture demonstrated a favorable safety profile in the treatment of MM. Conclusion: Findings suggest that acupuncture for MM produced the most notable reductions in migraine severity. Nevertheless, the GRADE assessment indicated low overall certainty of the evidence, with considerable heterogeneity present in multiple pooled analyses. Therefore, well-designed, large-scale RCTs are urgently required to strengthen the evidence base. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42022367446.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.