ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025
Machine learning models for mortality prediction in patients with spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage following ICU treatment.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is a severe and potentially life-threatening acute cerebrovascular disease. Early identification of the risk of death in patients with spontaneous SAH is of vital importance for improving prognosis, reducing mortality, and guiding clinical treatment. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the public database, Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC)-IV. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality following intensive care unit (ICU) treatment. All features were extracted from first-day ICU admission data. Data analysis was performed by using R and Python, with feature selection conducted via least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression. We constructed 8 models based on the 12 selected features in the training set and evaluated them in the test set by various metrics, including area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, precision (positive prediction value), recall (sensitivity), Brier score, Jordan index, and calibration slope. The most effective model was rendered explainable through the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) approach. Results: The study included 1,121 records, with 870 surviving and 251 deceased patients. We selected 43 features for the preliminary baseline analysis. Based on LASSO regression analysis and clinical practical significance, 12 features were finally included in the construction of the machine learning models. We constructed eight machine learning models, among which the logistic regression (LR) model performed the best. Conclusions: In our study, the LR model exhibited superior discrimination in predicting risk of mortality among patients with spontaneous SAH compared to other models. This research contributes to facilitating the early identification of mortality risk in patients with spontaneous SAH. External validation and further prospective studies are warranted to confirm and refine these predictive insights for clinical utilization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.