ArticleIEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions2024
RF-induced Heating Estimation of a Stent in a 3T MRI using Transfer Function Approach with a Tabletop E-field Generator.
Article in IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- An Interchangeability Test Method for Developing IPG Impedance Equivalency Evidence for Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Under MRI.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The use of a transfer function (TF) method enables a conservative estimation for radio frequency (RF) safety assessment of active implantable devices (AIMDs). The TF approach can be applied to various scan conditions, patient populations, and device trajectories inside the human body, reducing the computational burden of full-wave electromagnetic (EM) simulation. The in vitro TF model validation process is time-consuming, requiring tests in various sample trajectories that collectively exceed eight hours. Here, we demonstrated reducing the burden of the TF approach using a low-power tabletop E-field generator. We measured the TF of the stent via the piecewise excitation method at 128 MHz and validated it by exposing the device under diverse test exposure fields using a tabletop E-field generator that requires less phantom material, lower cost than whole-body coil or MRI scanner, and with reduced experimental safety hazards or shielded room requirements. The TF approach was used to predict radio frequency (RF)-induced power near the stent tip at 128 MHz and predicted values were then compared against measured values. We also used a body transmit coil to compare the conventional in vitro TF model validation approach and tabletop E-field generator. With the tabletop E-field generator, the equivalent absolute normalized error was (0.37 ± 0.31 dB) compared to the body transmit coil tests (0.43 ± 0.15 dB), and the required test time decreased from eight to three hours. In summary, we showed how a low-power compact E-field generator can be used for in vitro TF model validation with reduced testing time and cost without using a shielded room.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.