ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2025
Drug-induced agranulocytosis: a disproportionality analysis and umbrella review.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Drug-induced neutropenia: A comprehensive pharmacovigilance study of the FAERS database.Medicine · 2026Article
- Case Report: Life-threatening neutropenia with absolute neutrophil count of zero after low-dose regional arterial infusion chemotherapy to lung in a patient with advanced triple-negative breast cancer after multiple lines of treatment.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Drug-induced agranulocytosis (DIA) is a rare but life-threatening hematologic disorder that demands increased clinical and research attention. This study aimed to provide the current overview of DIA for clinical guidance. Methods: Using real-world data from FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), we performed a disproportionality analysis to identify the drugs associated with agranulocytosis, employing the information component and reporting odds ratio algorithms. Logistic analysis was conducted to explore the confounding factors of DIA. Time-to-onset analysis was implemented to compare the adverse event onset time among different drugs. To comprehensively supplement and corroborate our disproportionality findings, we further conducted an umbrella review of systematic reviews (SRs). Five electronic databases were searched with SRs addressing DIA as an included adverse event. Two independent reviewers performed literature screening, data extraction, and quality assessment according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis statement. The results of the included SRs were synthesized using qualitative analysis. Results: The disproportionality analysis revealed that most identified DIA signals were for anticancer drugs. The top-five drugs with DIA signals by case number were methotrexate (6,462 cases), lenalidomide (5,722 cases), rituximab (5,691 cases), doxorubicin (4,391 cases), and carboplatin (4,371 cases). High-risk drugs (e.g., deferiprone), old age, and abnormal weight were strongly associated with DIA based on multivariate logistic regression. Time-to-onset analysis showed that clozapine has the longest median of onset time (1,121.3 days), while azithromycin has the shortest time (8.1 days). The umbrella review included seven systematic reviews, with five focusing on anticancer therapy. Their findings on DIA-associated drugs, including protein kinase inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors, were consistent with those from the disproportionality analysis. Antibiotics, antithyroid drugs, and psychotropic drugs were also identified as causative drugs of DIA. Conclusion: This study systematically reviewed the FAERS database and existing literature on DIA to identify a spectrum of associated drugs. Anticancer drugs were predominant, with targeted therapies comprising a large proportion, while non-chemotherapy drugs were also identified as suspect drugs. These findings underscored the need for heightened clinical vigilance toward suspected drugs and highlighted the importance of future efforts to validate high-risk mechanisms and explore DIA monitoring strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.