Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41041638›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2025

Clinical development prospects of siRNA drugs for tumor therapy: analysis of clinical trial registration data from 2004 to 2024.

Cai-E Wang, Delong Zhen, Lukui Yang, Guifang Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Cai-E WangThe First Affiliated Hospital, and College of Clinical Medicine of Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, China.
Delong ZhenThe First Affiliated Hospital, and College of Clinical Medicine of Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, China.
Lukui YangThe First Affiliated Hospital, and College of Clinical Medicine of Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, China.
Guifang LiThe First Affiliated Hospital, and College of Clinical Medicine of Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This study systematically compares clinical trial patterns of siRNA drugs in oncology and non-oncology, aiming to inform optimized R&D strategies for oncology. Methods: Trial phases, sponsor countries, biomarkers, and targets were analyzed for global siRNA trials (2004-2024). Results: Non-oncology trial dominated (90% of 424 trials), peaking in 2021 (64 trials), and yielded 6 approved drugs for metabolic/genetic diseases. Key non-oncology targets included PCSK9 and HBV. Oncology trials initiated later, primarily focusing on phase I/II studies (60% phase I), targeting solid tumors (40%) and CSF2-related therapies (40%). Clinical trial activity in China commenced in 2019, demonstrating acceleration in 2023, yet overall trial volume remains lower than global benchmarks. Cross-target analysis has pinpointed PTGS2 and TGFB1 as shared targets, indicating the possibility for combination therapy. Conclusion: Overcoming technical challenges (e.g., targeted delivery) and exploiting multi-target synergies are critical to expanding siRNAs applications in oncology. Success in non-oncology settings demonstrates the translational potential of siRNA technology, however, oncology requires tailored strategies to address complex tumor biology and delivery barriers.

Indexed as

cancer therapyclinical trialsdrug delivery systemssiRNAtherapeutic targets

Identifiers

PMID41041638
PMCPMC12484142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.