ArticleJOR spine2025
Automated Computational Pathology to Assess Degenerative Disc Histology.
Article in JOR spine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Preclinical models of disc degeneration are important tools to discover disease pathology. Histopathology is often used to understand these changes, but analyses remain reliant on pathologists or graders using time-consuming scoring systems. The integration of computational pathology can improve this process by leveraging machine learning (ML) algorithms. Thus, this work aimed to develop a segmentation model to identify seven distinct disc tissues and utilize the segmented tissue areas generated from the model, along with other derived measures, to estimate pathological changes that align with traditional histological scoring. Methods: Hematoxylin and eosin-stained motion segment sections were collected from four independent studies. Each study included a disc injury puncture in Sprague Dawley rats. An active learning technique and a trained deep convolutional neural network were used to infer tissue segmentation. The model was then applied to untrained images to infer tissue segmentation, extract geometric and cell count features, and correlate these measurements with histologic scores from a standard scoring system. Results: The segmentation model was highly performant with an Intersection over Union (mIOU) and frequency weighted Intersection over Union (fwIOU) of 0.83 ± 0.04 and 0.94 ± 0.02 in the Test set, respectively. The ML-derived measures correlated well with histologic scores, with absolute ranges from rho = 0.65 to 0.87. Further, these ML-derived measures were altered with disc degeneration with significant differences in NP cell number, NP area ratio, NP/AF border, NP roundness, and AF perimeter. Lastly, our model could measure additional tissue changes not captured through a standard histological scoring system. Conclusions: Herein, we developed the first computational pathology model to phenotype disc degeneration tissue. Our model significantly correlates with traditional histopathology scoring methods, detects subtle differences between groups by directly measuring pathologic features in the images, and increases efficiency by automating the majority of the process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.