Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41041507›Full record

ArticleProgress in rehabilitation medicine2025

Longitudinal Study of Quality of Life in Individuals with Lower Limb Amputation.

Takashi Nakamura, Yoshiko Tobimatsu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Progress in rehabilitation medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Takashi NakamuraDepartment of Prosthetics and Orthotics, Research Institute of National Rehabilitation Center for Persons with Disabilities, Tokorozawa, Japan.
Yoshiko TobimatsuThe former President, National Rehabilitation Center for Persons with Disabilities, Tokorozawa, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Assessment of quality of life (QOL) is essential in evaluating rehabilitation outcomes for individuals with lower limb amputation (LLA). However, there are few longitudinal studies of QOL over extended periods. This study reports the findings of a third QOL survey conducted in 2021 using the Japanese version of the Prosthetic Evaluation Questionnaire (PEQ-J), following previous surveys in 2003 and 2011. Methods: The survey targeted 254 individuals with LLA who had received prosthetic limbs from our center. Questionnaires were mailed, and responses were analyzed using the PEQ-J. Results were compared with those from previous surveys. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to assess statistical significance. Results: Responses were received from 129 participants (response rate: 51%): 101 males and 28 females, with a mean age of 62.8 ± 14.8 years. Causes of amputation were trauma (n=83), disease (n=44), and others (n=2). The present survey had more older participants than the previous surveys. Fifty-seven individuals responded to both the 2011 and 2021 surveys. The most notable changes were observed in psychological domains. Sex-based differences in "Perceived Response" observed in 2011 were not present in 2021. Moreover, differences in "Frustration" and "Social Burden" related to time since amputation were no longer observed. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that psychological adaptation may evolve over time, reducing disparities previously associated with sex and amputation duration. Advanced prosthetics and the Tokyo 2020 Paralympic Games may have effected improvements in QOL in individuals with LLA.

Indexed as

paralympic gamesPEQprostheticssocial inclusionsurvey

Identifiers

PMID41041507
PMCPMC12484563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.