Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41041443›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025

Exploring life skills, research adaptation, and team building among basic medical postgraduates.

Qiqi Zhang, Xiaoqing Yuan, Ziyu Liu, Jie Liu, Diabate Ousmane, Junpu Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Qiqi Zhang *Department of Pathology, Xiangya School of Basic Medical Sciences, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Xiaoqing Yuan *Medical Research Center, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Ziyu LiuDepartment of Pathology, Xiangya School of Basic Medical Sciences, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Jie LiuDepartment of Pathology, Xiangya School of Basic Medical Sciences, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Diabate OusmaneDepartment of Pathology, Xiangya School of Basic Medical Sciences, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Junpu WangDepartment of Pathology, Xiangya School of Basic Medical Sciences, Central South University, Changsha, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Under the background of "basic top-notch 2.0" plan, taking the graduate students of Xiangya School of Basic Medical Sciences, Central South University as an example, to explore their current situations in life, academics, scientific research, and team collaboration, thereby offering insights for enhancing the quality of basic medical graduate education in China, achieving the plan's objectives, and shaping relevant policies. Methods: An online anonymous questionnaire was sent to graduate students of basic medicine majors in different grades of Xiangya School of Basic Medical Sciences, Central South University. The questionnaire included 24 questions covering different aspects of graduate life, and the data of 350 valid questionnaires were analyzed. The study reveals diverse academic backgrounds among basic medical graduate students, with nearly half (50%) originating from different disciplines. Results: Over 14% of students reported encountering learning difficulties, and many tended to seek help from peers rather than supervisors due to limited communication with their advisors. Approximately 80% of graduate students had flexible time management, yet only 26% received sufficient stipends to cover daily expenses, with an equal proportion facing inadequate research funding. Academic engagement was moderate (54.7%), though some students demonstrated low participation enthusiasm. Notably, nearly one-third (33.3%) had no prior research experience before enrollment. While overall satisfaction with supervisors' academic and research guidance was high (96.29%), senior students exhibited a slight decline in satisfaction. A strong preference for the teamwork environment was reported (86.57%), though the satisfaction of the graduating students with the team working atmosphere was somewhat lower. Finally, 20.86% expressed dissatisfaction with their overall graduate school experience. Discussion and conclusion: Data analysis revealed pertinent issues, serving as a reference for educational institutions across all levels in formulating policies, such as enhancing graduate student adaptation and academic experience, guiding graduate students to adapt to their specialties, establishing effective communication channels, reasonably managing their own time, boosting funding, constructing academic platforms, facilitating early scientific research collaborations, enhancing guidance, and fostering team building, among others, in order to improve the training model and mechanism and cultivate outstanding medical innovative talents.

Indexed as

basic excellence 2.0educational institutionsgraduate studentscientific researchsupervisor

Identifiers

PMID41041443
PMCPMC12484071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.