ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Exploring life skills, research adaptation, and team building among basic medical postgraduates.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Under the background of "basic top-notch 2.0" plan, taking the graduate students of Xiangya School of Basic Medical Sciences, Central South University as an example, to explore their current situations in life, academics, scientific research, and team collaboration, thereby offering insights for enhancing the quality of basic medical graduate education in China, achieving the plan's objectives, and shaping relevant policies. Methods: An online anonymous questionnaire was sent to graduate students of basic medicine majors in different grades of Xiangya School of Basic Medical Sciences, Central South University. The questionnaire included 24 questions covering different aspects of graduate life, and the data of 350 valid questionnaires were analyzed. The study reveals diverse academic backgrounds among basic medical graduate students, with nearly half (50%) originating from different disciplines. Results: Over 14% of students reported encountering learning difficulties, and many tended to seek help from peers rather than supervisors due to limited communication with their advisors. Approximately 80% of graduate students had flexible time management, yet only 26% received sufficient stipends to cover daily expenses, with an equal proportion facing inadequate research funding. Academic engagement was moderate (54.7%), though some students demonstrated low participation enthusiasm. Notably, nearly one-third (33.3%) had no prior research experience before enrollment. While overall satisfaction with supervisors' academic and research guidance was high (96.29%), senior students exhibited a slight decline in satisfaction. A strong preference for the teamwork environment was reported (86.57%), though the satisfaction of the graduating students with the team working atmosphere was somewhat lower. Finally, 20.86% expressed dissatisfaction with their overall graduate school experience. Discussion and conclusion: Data analysis revealed pertinent issues, serving as a reference for educational institutions across all levels in formulating policies, such as enhancing graduate student adaptation and academic experience, guiding graduate students to adapt to their specialties, establishing effective communication channels, reasonably managing their own time, boosting funding, constructing academic platforms, facilitating early scientific research collaborations, enhancing guidance, and fostering team building, among others, in order to improve the training model and mechanism and cultivate outstanding medical innovative talents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.