ArticleInternational journal of clinical pediatric dentistry2025
A Comparative Volumetric Evaluation of Three Different Obturation Techniques in Primary Teeth: An
Article in International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evaluation of the removal ability of Iodoform Paste in primary teeth pulpectomies using rotary files: a pilot study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The success of endodontic treatment in a primary teeth depends on good biomechanical preparation as well as the quality of obturation. In order to ensure this success, the properties of obturating material as well as the technique of insertion is crucial. Aims: The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the quality of obturation with Pastinject and NaviTip to that of an endodontic plugger, using zinc oxide eugenol (ZOE) in extracted primary mandibular molars, with the assistance of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Materials and methods: A total of 99 primary mandibular second molar root canals were selected, and 33 canals were randomly allocated in each obturating group by block randomization method: group I-endodontic pluggers; group II-NaviTip; and group III-Pastinject. The total volume of root canal before obturation (X) was measured in mm Results and discussion: The results of the present study showed significant difference between the three groups in terms of POV ( Conclusion: It was concluded that Pastinject provided the best result with the highest POV and lowest volume of voids. Pastinject also had the least number of voids and maximum number of optimally filled canals. How to cite this article: Subramanian A, Kannan VP, Santhakumar M. A Comparative Volumetric Evaluation of Three Different Obturation Techniques in Primary Teeth: An
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.