Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41041392›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2025

Different Data for Different Goals: Exploring Trade-Offs and Synergies in the Use of Spatial Data Inputs to Optimize Conservation Action in Sagebrush Ecosystems.

Jessica E Shyvers, Bryan C Tarbox, Adrian P Monroe, Nicholas J Van Lanen, Benjamin S Robb, Erin K Buchholtz, Courtney J Duchardt, David R Edmunds, Michael S O'Donnell, Nathan D Van Schmidt and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jessica E ShyversU.S. Geological Survey Fort Collins Science Center Fort Collins Colorado USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4307-0004
Bryan C TarboxU.S. Geological Survey Fort Collins Science Center Fort Collins Colorado USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5040-3949
Adrian P MonroeU.S. Geological Survey Fort Collins Science Center Fort Collins Colorado USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0934-8225
Nicholas J Van LanenU.S. Geological Survey Fort Collins Science Center Fort Collins Colorado USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0871-0261
Benjamin S RobbU.S. Geological Survey Fort Collins Science Center Fort Collins Colorado USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1419-3918
Erin K BuchholtzU.S. Geological Survey South Carolina Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Clemson University Clemson South Carolina USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1985-9531
Courtney J DuchardtSchool of Natural Resources and the Environment University of Arizona Tucson Arizona USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4563-0199
David R EdmundsU.S. Geological Survey Fort Collins Science Center Fort Collins Colorado USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5212-8271
Michael S O'DonnellU.S. Geological Survey Fort Collins Science Center Fort Collins Colorado USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3488-003X
Nathan D Van SchmidtU.S. Geological Survey Fort Collins Science Center Fort Collins Colorado USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5973-7934
Julie A HeinrichsNatural Resource Ecology Laboratory Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, 80523 in Cooperation with the U.S. Geological Survey, Fort Collins Science Center Fort Collins Colorado USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7733-5034
Cameron L AldridgeU.S. Geological Survey Fort Collins Science Center Fort Collins Colorado USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3926-6941

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ecosystems worldwide continue to experience rapid rates of habitat and species loss. Management actions to conserve and restore functional habitats are needed to reduce these declines, but funding and resources for such actions are limited. Spatial conservation prioritization (SCP) can facilitate strategic decision-making for targeted conservation planning and delivery, but complexities arise when management objectives include multiple wildlife species and ecological or management constraints, all of which can be further complicated by data uncertainty and existing conservation plans. The Prioritizing Restoration of Sagebrush Ecosystems Tool (PReSET), an R package-based decision-support tool, supports strategic ecosystem management planning across the sagebrush biome by using SCP. We adapted PReSET to better address the needs of multiple wildlife species, evaluate the effects of different ecological or management constraints on conservation outcomes, assess the influence of data uncertainty, and integrate existing conservation plans. Specifically, we developed optimization problems to identify priority sagebrush protection and restoration across the state of Wyoming, USA, and evaluated the efficacy and trade-offs of various approaches to problem design. We evaluated trade-offs in targeting multiple species compared to a single species, including using greater sage-grouse as a potential umbrella species to benefit other sagebrush-dependent wildlife. We then evaluated multi-species protection and restoration problems aimed at minimizing the risks of inadequate connectivity, climate change, and restoration failure, and accounted for data uncertainty to assess relationships between risk aversion of managers and conservation outcomes. We also developed optimization problems within conservation areas identified by an existing sagebrush conservation plan to evaluate the efficacy of guiding local-scale conservation delivery within more broadly defined conservation areas. Our results demonstrate how SCP methods can leverage novel spatial data to develop targeted decision-support resources that can facilitate landscape conservation planning and improve management outcomes across a wide array of systems and species.

Indexed as

decision‐support toolecosystem managementgreater sage‐grousespatial conservation prioritizationsystematic conservation planningumbrella species

Identifiers

PMID41041392
PMCPMC12483841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.