ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Joint effect of sleep duration and sleep quality on self-rated health among Canadian adults: estimating relative excess risk due to interaction from a nationwide survey.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association between sleep duration and co-existing chronic conditions in adults: insights from the 2017-2018 Canadian Community Health Survey.Frontiers in sleep · 2026Article
- Commentary: Joint effect of sleep duration and sleep quality on self-rated health among Canadian adults: estimating relative excess risk due to interaction from a nationwide survey.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Self-rated health (SRH) is a globally recognized measure of health status. Previous studies have established that inadequate sleep duration and trouble falling asleep combinedly has a greater negative impact on health than either factor alone. This study aims to investigate the excess relative risk due to the interaction between short sleep duration and trouble sleeping on SRH. Method: We used the 2017-18 Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS) publicly used microdata file. SRH was measured on a 5-point Likert scale from poor to excellent and dichotomized into "Good or Better" and "Fair or Poor." Sleep duration was categorized into "Less than 7 h" and "More than 7 h," while trouble sleeping was categorized as "Yes" or "No." A joint variable derived from these created four groups: "no sleep issues," "fewer sleeping hours (<7 h) only," "trouble sleeping only," and "fewer hours & trouble sleeping." A weighted univariable and multivariable logistic regression with robust variance estimation was conducted to estimate relative risk due to interaction. Results: Among Canadian adults, 40.96% reported less than 7 h of sleep, and 48.38% reported trouble sleeping. Approximately 11% had Fair or Poor SRH. The odds ratio for Fair or Poor SRH was 1.34 (95% CI: 1.23-1.46) for short sleep duration, 2.38 (95% CI: 2.18-2.61) for troubled sleep, and 2.97 (95% CI, 2.66-3.33) for both conditions. The adjusted RERI was 0.80 (95% CI, 0.40-1.21). Implication: These results imply that shorter duration of sleep and troubled sleeping may increase the negative influence on self-rated health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.