ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Precarious work and chronic disease: lessons learned from the US national agricultural worker survey (1999-2020).
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Precarious employment and labor exploitation in farmworkers is historical and pervasive in the United States. Methods: We analyzed cross-sectional data from the National Agricultural Worker Survey (1999-2020, NAWS) among 46,910 farmworkers. A multidimensional precarious employment score (PES) was developed using work indicators and cardiovascular risk factors and cardiovascular disease (CVD). Analysis included: (1) Poisson regression model with LASSO for key predictor selection across three health outcomes; (2) PES construction to track employment conditions over time; and (3) subgroups analyses to assess disparities and trends in employment precarity. Results: Women showed no reduction in PES over time. Indigenous farmworkers [mean ( Conclusions: Within this precarious workforce there were differences in PES and chronic disease. Biosocial data is needed to better understand the pathways of how precarious employment impacts the health of this workforce.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.