SynthesisFrontiers in immunology2025
Serum Krebs von den Lungen-6 before treatment predicts the prognosis of lung cancer in Asian populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Up until now, no clear consensus has been reached on the role of serum Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6) levels in predicting survival in patients with lung cancer. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the prognostic value of serum KL-6 levels before treatment in lung cancer. Methods: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched for relevant studies from inception to June 23, 2025. This study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024568549). Results: Thirteen studies involving 1,723 patients were included in this meta-analysis. High serum KL-6 levels before treatment were associated with shorter progression-free survival (hazard ratio [HR] 1.89, 95% confidence intervals [95% CI]: 1.46-2.44, P<0.001; heterogeneity: I²=6.5%, P = 0.37) and overall survival (OS) (HR 1.76, 95% CI: 1.37-2.26, P<0.001; heterogeneity: I²=51.9%, P = 0.023). Subgroup analysis revealed the significant value of elevated KL-6 level for predicting OS of patients with lung cancer without interstitial lung disease (ILD) but not for those with ILD. The pooled results indicated that OS and progression-free survival were shortened when serum KL-6 level exceeded 500 U/mL. The serum KL-6 level determined using electrochemiluminescence immunoassay had a greater predictive value for OS than that determined using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in this study. Conclusion: Elevated serum KL-6 levels (>500 U/mL) before treatment represent a biomarker for poor prognosis of lung cancer for Asian patients without ILD. However, in patients with pre-existing ILD, these elevated levels are more likely to indicate the severity and activity of the underlying fibrotic lung disease rather than providing independent prognostic information about the cancer itself. Electrochemiluminescence immunoassay was recommended for determining the serum KL-6 level. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42024568549.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.