ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025
Comprehensive analysis of metabolic patterns in renal cell carcinoma: implications for prognosis and treatment.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Rewiring tumor metabolism: heterogeneity, oncometabolites, and adaptive plasticity.Experimental hematology & oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) presents significant clinical and molecular heterogeneity, which makes prognosis and treatments very complicated. Despite advances in surgical and systemic therapies, a substantial number of RCC patients progress to advanced stages, highlighting the need for novel stratification approaches that account for the tumor's biological complexity. Methods: An integrative multi-omic analysis, combining transcriptomic and clinical data, was performed to identify the metabolic subtypes of RCC. Unsupervised clustering was used to stratify patients based on their metabolic profiles, and subtype-specific molecular signatures were examined through differential expression and pathway enrichment analyses. Prognostic outcomes, immune features, and drug sensitivities were then analyzed. The value of the classification was validated by the biological experiments. Results: Three distinct metabolic subtypes (C1, C2, and C3) were identified, each associated with distinct survival outcomes. The C1 subtype, marked by enhanced oxidative phosphorylation and fatty acid metabolism, correlated with improved survival. The C2 subtype, characterized by prostaglandin biosynthesis, was linked to poor prognosis and immune evasion. The C3 subtype was similar to C2 but was characterized by extensive prostanoid biosynthesis, indicating a moderate prognosis in the three subtypes. Immunotherapy and targeted drug sensitivity analyses revealed subtype-specific vulnerabilities, suggesting potential therapeutic strategies tailored to each metabolic profile. Subsequent Conclusions: Metabolic subtyping through multi-omics integration offers a clinically relevant framework for RCC prognosis and personalized treatment. This approach highlights the role of metabolic reprogramming in tumor immunity and therapeutic response, providing a foundation for future clinical applications in precision oncology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.