Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41041257›Full record

ReviewJournal of family medicine and primary care2025

Compliance of post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) following animal bite in Indian population: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Aninda Debnath, Venu George Toppo, Nitin Panwar, Trideep Jyoti Deori, Aereosonova Khongsit, Jugal Kishore

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Aninda DebnathDepartment of Community Medicine, VMMC and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Venu George ToppoDepartment of Community Medicine, VMMC and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Nitin PanwarDepartment of Community Medicine, VMMC and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Trideep Jyoti DeoriDepartment of Community Medicine, PA Sangma International Medical College and Hospital, Meghalaya, India.
Aereosonova KhongsitDoctoral Researcher, Faculty of Social Sciences (SOC), Tampere University, Finland.
Jugal KishoreDepartment of Community Medicine, VMMC and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rabies is a life-threatening zoonotic disease in India, leading to numerous fatalities annually. Despite the availability of effective post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP), compliance with completing the vaccination regimen remains low, impeding efforts to control and eliminate the disease. This study aimed to assess PEP compliance rates among individuals exposed to rabies in India and identify key factors contributing to non-compliance. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Databases including PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science were searched for studies on PEP compliance in India. Eligible studies were community-based or hospital-based and published in English. The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) tool assessed study quality. A random effects model calculated pooled compliance rates, with heterogeneity assessed using the I² statistic and a Chi-square-based Q test. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses, as well as Egger's test, were performed to explore variations and check for publication bias. The analysis included 30 studies, with a pooled compliance rate of 57% and high heterogeneity (I² =99.69%). Compliance was higher with the intradermal (ID) regimen than the intramuscular (IM) regimen, though adherence decreased over time. Economic constraints, logistical challenges, lack of awareness, cultural beliefs, and fear of side effects were major barriers to completion. Compliance was higher among those with severe bites. PEP compliance in India is low, hindered by various barriers. The ID regimen showed better adherence but also faced declining compliance over time. Improving PEP adherence requires targeted interventions such as education, logistical support, and promoting shorter ID regimens.

Indexed as

Complianceintradermalrabiesrabies vaccinesvaccines

Identifiers

PMID41041257
PMCPMC12488117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.