Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41041253›Full record

ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2025

Decreased anxiety through haptic technology patch usage: A case-control comparison.

Janet Fason, Jeffrey Gudin, Peter Hurwitz

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07785960 (Recovery and Early Sleep Tracking Using the SuperPatch REM Patch), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07785960 naenrolling by invitationnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Recovery and Early Sleep Tracking Using the SuperPatch REM Patch

TypeinterventionalSponsorSuperPatch Limited LLCRan2026 to 2026Enrolled20ConditionsShift Work Sleep Disorder, Shift Work Type Circadian Rhythm Sleep Disorder, Shift Work Sleep DisordersArmsSuperPatch REM Patch, Sham REM Patch
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Janet FasonChief Medical Officer, Stein Medical, Tyrone, Georgia, USA.
Jeffrey GudinDepartment of Pain and Palliative Care, Miami University School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA.
Peter HurwitzPresident, Clarity Science LLC, Rhode Island, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Chronic anxiety affects one-third of US adults and has increased by 6% from 2023 to 2024. Medical management is typically psychopharmacology utilizing antidepressants and/or anxiolytics and psychotherapy, but these are not always successful as treatments. Nonadherence or noncompliance to prescribed drugs for mental health disorders is common, and benzodiazepines as an anxiolytic class are also recognized as especially subject to misuse. Settings and Design: This single blinded, case-control study tested the use of a potential alternative or adjunctive treatment for anxiety of a Haptic Vibrotactile Technology patch. Methods and Materials: There were 102 adults enrolled in the study. 65 were assigned to the treatment group (TG) and 37 to the control group (CG). The TG gender ratio was 49 females/16 males; the CG gender ratio was 23 females/14 males. Two types of validated surveys were utilized, the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) and the Short Form-20 (SF-20), and these two scaled surveys were administered at the three study intervals of Baseline, Day 7, and Day 14. Statistical Analysis Used: The numerically coded quantitative data collected were analyzed using SPSS software. Data were analyzed using paired t-tests and a two-tailed alpha level of 0.05 was used for all statistical comparisons. Results: At Day 14, there was a 31.3% difference between TG and CG for the PSS, showing marked positive effect for the TG patients as compared to the CG patients. The mean PSS score for TG patients decreased by 33%, showing a significant reduction in emotional/mental stress. For the SF-20, a positive change in the TG was shown, with a 23.8% increase in the percent score for the survey's Mental Health domain and a notable increase for the Health Perception domain. At Day 14, >90% of the TG reported satisfaction with the patch; 90% indicated that they would recommend it. In contrast, there was little change in all PSS and SF-20 scores from baseline to Day 14 for the CG; 97.3% of the CG were not at all satisfied with the patch (which was a placebo), and only 3% reported they would recommend it. Conclusions: The overall findings of this clinical trial revealed that the studied patch (PEACE Patch with vibrotactile trigger technology [VTT]; Super Patch Company, Srysty Holding Co, Toronto, Canada) was effective in reducing anxiety symptoms. Gaining a better understanding of how the brain interacts with external stimuli, such as through VTT, may lead to the development of more viable, safe, and effective "drug-free" treatment options, which can provide adults living with chronic anxiety more potential options for relieving their symptoms and acquiring a better overall quality of life. The VTT patch utilized in this study appears to be effective in reducing anxiety symptoms and so may present an alternative or adjunct treatment modality for chronic anxiety. Further research is needed to determine if the results found in our study differ depending upon the specific adult age demographic studied, such as effectiveness in the younger, middle-aged, and senior-aged adult population, rather than across the entire adult age group spectrum, and also in adults with poststroke or post-traumatic brain injury or living with various neurodegenerative disorders.

Indexed as

Anxietyhaptic technologyhaptic vibrotactile trigger technologyperceived stress scaleSF-20stressVTT

Identifiers

PMID41041253
PMCPMC12488145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.