ReviewJournal of family medicine and primary care2025
Insights into household air pollution: A systematic scoping review on perceptions of solid biomass fuel use in South Asian countries.
Review in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Health Under Haze: Symptom Burden Among Adult Outpatients During the 2024-2025 Winter Smog Season in Lahore, Pakistan.Public health challenges · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Over half of the world's population cooks using solid fuels, which poses serious health hazards, making women and children more vulnerable to household air pollution (HAP). Despite progress towards universal access to cleaner fuels, 47% of families continue to use fossil fuels. Objectives: This review aimed to understand the perceptions of solid fuel users in South Asian countries regarding the use of solid fuel for lighting, heating, and cooking. Materials and Methods: The perceptions of solid fuel users were categorized into six key domains derived from the Social Ecological Model (SEM): (a) Community, Family, and Health, (b) Home, Space, Place, and Roles, (c) Cultural and Cooking Practices, (d) Environment, and (e) Practice and Policy Development. This scoping assessment was conducted using the PRISMA-ScR guideline, and finally twenty-four articles were selected from four databases: Scopus, Web of Science, Science Direct, and PubMed. The result was categorized under six key domains based on the SEM. Results: The review revealed inconsistencies and a research gap in HAP perceptions. Participants prioritized household security over ventilation and short-term health over the long-term benefits of treatment. Women and children, experiencing higher HAP exposure rates than men, had less decision-making authority over the use of solid fuels, highlighting a socio-demographic gender gap. Community norms and cultural traditions play a crucial role in policy and practice. Conclusion: Further research and locally-based, community-led interventions are necessary to bridge these gaps and minimize the global burden of illness related to HAP. Addressing the identified gaps and disconnects is crucial to decreasing the global illness burden linked to HAP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.