ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2025
Treatment approach and outcomes to severe and chronic dysphagia in lateral medullary syndrome: A case series.
Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Dysphagia is more profound in lateral medullary syndrome (LMS) patients. LMS patients are susceptible to be dependent on tube feeding for months to years post stroke. The objectives of this study are to characterize and understand the extent of functional impairment in the swallowing phases, to strategize the noninvasive methods as per the deficits present, and to document swallowing outcomes of severe and chronic dysphagia following rehabilitation in patients with LMS. Materials and Methods: This is an ambispective observational study on chronic LMS (≥1 year) patients with complete dependency on tube feeding. Dysphagia was assessed with clinical bedside swallowing examination and video fluoroscopy swallowing study (VFSS), penetration-aspiration scale (PAS), dysphagia severity rating scale (DSRS), bolus residue scale (BRS), and functional oral intake scale (FOIS). Results: Six patients were included in our study for the final analysis. Initial VFSS was done at FOIS level 1 and a DSRS score of 12. The BRS and PAS score of all patients at this stage was 6. The second VFSS was done when patients achieved FOIS level ≥2 and a DSRS score of ≤10. At this stage, BRS was 4 ± 0.8, while PAS improved to 4 at the interval of 8 ± 3 weeks following rehabilitation. Final VFSS was performed at FOIS level ≥4 and DSRS ≤3. BRS and PAS at this stage were ≤2. This was achieved in 20.8 ± 8.3 weeks from the onset of rehabilitation. Conclusion: Chronic and severe dysphagia in LMS has a favorable recovery prospects. In our study, patients resumed complete oral feeding following dysphagia rehabilitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.