ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2025
Local wound care and circumstances of animal bite reported by attendees of a rabies vaccination clinic in Kolkata.
Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Rabies remains a significant public health challenge, particularly in developing countries like India, where it is primarily transmitted through animal bites, predominantly from dogs. Effective wound management following bites is critical for reducing rabies transmission. However, studies indicate that proper wound care practices are often neglected, leading to increased incidence rates. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the wound care measures adopted by individuals attending a rabies vaccination clinic and to assess the relationship between these practices and participants' sociodemographic characteristics. Materials and Methods: An observational, descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted in a rabies vaccination clinic of Kolkata, over 3 months (July 2024 to September 2024). The calculated sample size of 322 participants was selected using systematic random sampling technique. Data were collected through a pretested, validated interviewer-administered questionnaire, focusing on sociodemographic characteristics and wound care practices, particularly the timing and methods of wound washing. Results: Of the 322 participants, 69.57% were aged 20-59 years, with 32.92% being female and 92.24% residing in urban areas. Unprovoked bites constituted 54.66% of total bites. Although 90.68% reported washing their wounds post-bite, only 10.87% adhered to the recommended practice of washing for at least 15 min with soap and under running water. Notably, sociodemographic characteristics showed no significant association with wound washing practices. Conclusion: Despite the awareness of wound washing, improper practices persist, highlighting a need for targeted educational programs to enhance awareness about optimal wound care following animal bites. Public health initiatives should focus on improving awareness across all demographics to effectively mitigate rabies transmission.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.