Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41041148›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in nuclear medicine2025

Fast PET reconstruction with variance reduction and prior-aware preconditioning.

Matthias J Ehrhardt, Zeljko Kereta, Georg Schramm

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in nuclear medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. PET rapid image reconstruction challenge (PETRIC).Frontiers in nuclear medicine · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Matthias J EhrhardtDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom.
Zeljko KeretaComputer Science Department, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Georg SchrammDepartment of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Funding

MR/PET Motion Correction From Coil FingerprintsR01EB029306 · NIBIB · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI BOADA, FERNANDO E · 2020 to 2023
$2.6M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB029306
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We investigated subset-based optimization methods for positron emission tomography (PET) image reconstruction incorporating a regularizing prior. PET reconstruction methods that use a prior, such as the relative difference prior (RDP), are of particular relevance because they are widely used in clinical practice and have been shown to outperform conventional early-stopped and post-smoothed ordered subset expectation maximization. Our study evaluated these methods using both simulated data and real brain PET scans from the 2024 PET Rapid Image Reconstruction Challenge (PETRIC), where the main objective was to achieve RDP-regularized reconstructions as fast as possible, making it an ideal benchmark. Our key finding is that incorporating the effect of the prior into the preconditioner is crucial for ensuring fast and stable convergence. In extensive simulation experiments, we compared several stochastic algorithms-including stochastic gradient descent (SGD), stochastic averaged gradient amelioré (SAGA), and stochastic variance reduced gradient (SVRG)-under various algorithmic design choices and evaluated their performance for varying count levels and regularization strengths. The results showed that SVRG and SAGA outperformed SGD, with SVRG demonstrating a slight overall advantage. The insights gained from these simulations directly contributed to the design of our submitted algorithms, which formed the basis of the winning contribution to the PETRIC 2024 challenge.

Indexed as

image reconstructionMAPPETpreconditioningregularization methodsstochastic gradient methodsvariance reduction

Identifiers

PMID41041148
PMCPMC12484155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.