Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41041111›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Green Surgery and Sustainability in Orthopaedic Operating Rooms: A Comprehensive Review of Environmental Initiatives.

Ahmed Mohamed, Usman Fuad, Adham Elsayed, Alaa Elasad

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ahmed MohamedTrauma and Orthopaedics, Royal Cornwall Hospital, Truro, GBR.
Usman FuadTrauma and Orthopaedics, Royal Cornwall Hospital, Truro, GBR.
Adham ElsayedTrauma and Orthopaedics, Royal Cornwall Hospital, Truro, GBR.
Alaa ElasadGeneral Practice, Zagazig University, Zagazig, EGY.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Healthcare systems worldwide contribute significantly to environmental degradation through substantial carbon emissions and waste generation. Operating rooms, particularly orthopaedic theatres, are among the most resource-intensive areas within healthcare facilities. With the growing recognition of climate change as a major health threat, sustainability initiatives in perioperative care have become increasingly important. This narrative review examines current sustainability initiatives in orthopaedic operating rooms, evaluating strategies to reduce waste generation and environmental impact while maintaining patient care. A comprehensive literature review was conducted, examining peer-reviewed articles, systematic reviews, and policy documents related to environmental sustainability in operating rooms, with a specific focus on orthopaedic surgery. Sources included waste audit studies, carbon footprint analyses, and reports on green operating room initiatives published between 2013 and 2024. Sustainability initiatives in orthopaedic operating rooms can significantly reduce energy consumption and waste production. However, successful implementation faces challenges. Collaboration between different healthcare departments and sustainability multi-disciplinary team discussions are recommended for overcoming future challenges.

Indexed as

carbon footprintcircular economyenvironmental impactgreen operating roomoperating roomorthopaedic surgerysustainabilitywaste reduction

Identifiers

PMID41041111
PMCPMC12488290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.