ReviewCureus2025
Effectiveness of Beta-Blockers in Reducing Mortality and Recurrence After Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review of Contemporary and Foundational Evidence.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Metabolic Disturbances Associated with Beta-Blocker Therapy: New Insights from a Large-Scale Pharmacovigilance Study.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Beta-blockers have traditionally been a mainstay in the management of patients recovering from myocardial infarction (MI). However, their role in the era of modern cardiac interventions remains a topic of active discussion. This systematic review evaluated evidence from 1983 to 2014, drawn from PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and CENTRAL, on the effectiveness of beta-blockers in reducing mortality and recurrent cardiovascular events in adults following MI. After a comprehensive screening process, four eligible studies (two randomized controlled trials, one post hoc analysis, and one observational study) were included, encompassing a total of 19,078 participants with varied clinical settings and patient profiles. Across these studies, beta-blocker therapy was consistently associated with reductions in all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and recurrent MI, particularly among individuals with reduced left ventricular function. Some benefit was also observed in those with preserved function, though with less consistency. The magnitude of benefit included a 23-26% reduction in overall mortality and up to a 41% reduction in recurrent MI. Despite differences in study design, patient characteristics, and treatment protocols, the overall findings support the continued use of beta-blockers in post-infarction care. Limitations included heterogeneity in populations, beta-blocker regimens, and study eras, highlighting the need for individualized treatment approaches. Nonetheless, these results align with current guidelines from the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association and the European Society of Cardiology, reaffirming the relevance of beta-blockers in improving outcomes in this patient population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.