Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41041088›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Periocular Reconstruction in Facial Trauma: Surgical Approaches and Multidisciplinary Perspectives.

Fernando Fernández Varela Gómez, Katherine López Soto, Reinhard A Ortiz Beitz, Víctor Hugo Garzón Ortega, Alec Anceno, Kevin J Fuentes Calvo, Kenzo Alejandro Fukumoto Inukai, Samantha Palomino Rangel, Fidel Iván Flores Pérez, María Paola Orozco Náder and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Fernando Fernández Varela GómezDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, MEX.
Katherine López SotoInternal Medicine, Hospital Central Sur de Alta Especialidad, Mexico City, MEX.
Reinhard A Ortiz BeitzDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, MEX.
Víctor Hugo Garzón OrtegaDepartment of Surgery, Christus Muguerza Hospital Alta Especialidad, Monterrey, MEX.
Alec AncenoDepartment of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA.
Kevin J Fuentes CalvoDepartment of Surgery, Hospital Médica Sur, Mexico City, MEX.
Kenzo Alejandro Fukumoto InukaiDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, MEX.
Samantha Palomino RangelDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, MEX.
Fidel Iván Flores PérezDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, MEX.
María Paola Orozco NáderDepartment of Ophthalmology, Universidad Panamericana, Mexico City, MEX.
Mauricio G Padilla SierraPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Hospital Ángeles Pedregal, Mexico City, MEX.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Periocular reconstruction after facial trauma addresses the intricate anatomy and essential functions of the eye region. This summary explores the epidemiology, classification, preoperative planning, timing, and reconstructive strategies for periocular injuries. Classification by the type of injury and the affected structure informs surgical approaches, supported by detailed imaging and clinical assessments. Timing of reconstruction ranges from immediate action in critical cases to delayed procedures when stability permits. Techniques like local flaps, grafts, microvascular transfers, and innovations such as 3D-printed implants are customized to each defect. Key priorities include restoring the eyelid margin, preserving the lacrimal system, and adapting to age-specific needs, such as in children or older adults. Multidisciplinary teamwork enhances perioperative care, focusing on infection control and inflammation management. While advances improve outcomes, challenges remain in standardizing results and determining optimal intervention timing, pointing to areas for future exploration in periocular trauma care.

Indexed as

facial traumamultidisciplinary collaborationorbital fracturesperiocular reconstructionreconstructive techniques

Identifiers

PMID41041088
PMCPMC12483834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.