Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41041031›Full record

ArticleJournal of current ophthalmology

Efficacy and Safety of Nebulized Midazolam versus Oral Midazolam as Sedative Premedication in Pediatric Surgeries.

Abbas Ostadalipour, Anahid Maleki, Bita Malekianzadeh, Motahhareh Sadeghi, Alireza Takzare, Nima Nazari, Sumaiya Zahra, Armin Sahba, Parisa Kianpour, Saghar Samimi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of current ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Abbas OstadalipourEye Research Center, Farabi Eye Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Anahid MalekiEye Research Center, Farabi Eye Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Bita MalekianzadehEye Research Center, Farabi Eye Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Motahhareh SadeghiTranslational Ophthalmology Research Center, Farabi Eye Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Alireza TakzareEye Research Center, Farabi Eye Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Nima NazariAnesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Management Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Sumaiya ZahraDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, International Campus, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Armin SahbaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Parisa KianpourAnesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Management Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Saghar SamimiEye Research Center, Farabi Eye Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the effectiveness of midazolam premedication administered through nebulization and orally as premedication in pediatric anesthesia in ophthalmic surgeries. Methods: In this randomized controlled double-blind trial, 70 patients scheduled for strabismus surgery were enrolled and divided into two groups. Group O (oral, Results: A significant difference in oxygen saturation (SpO Conclusions: In pediatric patients undergoing ophthalmic surgeries, nebulized midazolam is as effective as oral midazolam for sedation. The nebulized form is better tolerated and results in significantly improved SpO

Indexed as

MidazolamNebulizedPediatricsPreoperative sedation

Identifiers

PMID41041031
PMCPMC12487797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.