ReviewJournal of current ophthalmology
An Integrative Review for Clinical Evaluation of Color Vision: The Right Test for the Right Disease.
Review in Journal of current ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To present an integrative review of the different color vision tests, their construction specificities, and their applications in ophthalmological and neurological diseases. Methods: The literature was searched using the online databases such as PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and PsycInfo. The inclusion criteria included English studies, which focused on color measurement or evaluation for clinical diagnosis, involving group comparisons of congenital or acquired color deficiencies and healthy controls, participants over the age of 18 years, and published after 1970. Results: We provide detailed descriptions of traditional and new computerized color vision tests including the test background, the prioritized level of processing, considerations regarding whether the test is more retinal or cortical tuned, if the task/skill measured is detection, discrimination or performance in color manipulation, and when to apply the respective tests. Conclusion: The findings highlight the strong potential of color perception assessment in identifying early retinal changes and marking the progression of diseases, sometimes in subclinical conditions, in various ophthalmological and neurological conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.