Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41041022›Full record

ArticleJournal of current ophthalmology

Surgical Learning: A Survey to Evaluate How Ophthalmologists Learn New Surgical Techniques.

Jee-Ah Sarah Oh, Stephen Ng, Jie Zhang, James McKelvie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of current ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jee-Ah Sarah OhDepartment of Ophthalmology, Health New Zealand Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Stephen Ng *Department of Ophthalmology, Health New Zealand Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.
Jie Zhang *Department of Ophthalmology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
James McKelvieDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate ophthalmologists' attitudes and approaches to learning new surgical techniques. Methods: This cross-sectional, prospective study distributed an anonymous, voluntary web-based survey via email to surgeons of the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Ophthalmologists (RANZCO). The survey collected data on demographics, fellowship training, practice location, the number of trainee surgeons supervised, the impact of Coronavirus disease 2019, resources for surgical learning, and perceived barriers to learning and adopting new techniques. Multiple-choice, scaled response, and open-ended questions were used in the survey. Results: Seventy-five surveys were completed (7.1% of 1050 members). Multivariable analysis demonstrated that the number of new surgical techniques adopted over the preceding 5 years was associated with the number of trainee surgeons supervised ( Conclusions: This is the first study exploring how ophthalmologists learn new surgical techniques. The widespread use of YouTube for surgical learning highlights the opportunity for postgraduate colleges to create or post quality-controlled online video resources for their members.

Indexed as

Learning resourcesOphthalmologistsProfessional developmentSurgeonsSurgical learning

Identifiers

PMID41041022
PMCPMC12487808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.