ArticleInternational journal of clinical pediatric dentistry2025
Scale of Oral Health Outcomes for Children: A Reliability Generalization Meta-analysis of Cronbach's Alpha.
Article in International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This review aimed to meta-analyze the Cronbach's α of the Scale of Oral Health Outcomes-5 (SOHO-5) questionnaire. Materials and methods: A systematic search of literature was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, Web of Science, Dentistry and Oral Sciences Source (EBSCO), and CINAHL using the keywords "Scale of Oral Health Outcomes" OR "SOHO" AND "Child OR Children." Studies reported in English with Cronbach's α for the SOHO questionnaire were included. Screening was done by two trained experts independently. Information on descriptive metadata of the studies, country, sample size, age, sex distribution, target population, language of administration, conditions studied, study setting, study design, patient selection, and Cronbach's α of child and parent versions was collected. The "COSMIN" checklist for internal consistency reliability was used for quality assessment. Heterogeneity was assessed using Results: A total of 350 studies were available for the title and abstract screening, and only 34 studies were eligible for full-text screening, of which 12 studies were included for analysis. The overall estimates were 0.83 (95% CI = 0.79-0.86) and 0.85 (95% CI: 0.81-0.90; Conclusion: The SOHO questionnaire has good internal consistency and reliability and can be used in research and practice. How to cite this article: Pentapati KC, Chenna D, Vijay KS,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.