ArticleInternational journal of clinical pediatric dentistry2025
Comparative Evaluation of Bioflx Crowns, Preformed Zirconia Crowns, and CAD/CAM Crowns-Resistant to Fracture: An
Article in International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The most prevalent childhood illness, early childhood caries (ECC), is frequently accompanied by severe comorbidities that have an impact on children's quality of life as well as that of their families, the community, and the medical system. Carious primary teeth have been widely treated with a variety of materials, with varied degrees of effectiveness. These materials include amalgam, glass ionomer, stainless-steel crowns (SSCs), and, more recently, zirconia and Bioflx crowns. SSC has been the gold standard for restoring carious primary molars for almost 70 years because of its affordability, longevity, and very easy process. Parents are frequently unsatisfied with SSCs' esthetic qualities, despite the technology's benefits. In this study, we assessed the link between dimensional variation and the fracture resistance of Bioflx crowns and commercially available prefabricated primary zirconia crowns. The crowns were randomly divided into three groups. A universal testing machine was used to perform fracture tests on each sample. Computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) zirconia posterior crowns had the greatest mean load (1413.80 ± 7.085 N), followed by preformed zirconia crowns (391.20 ± 3.564 N) and Bioflx crowns with the least mean load (104.80 ± 2.280 N). In general, the examined zirconia and Bioflx crowns exhibited the best mechanical qualities to endure the stresses of mastication. How to cite this article: Gupta N, Ghambir N, Singh D,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.