SynthesisFrontiers in psychiatry2025
Therapeutic effects of eye movement desensitization and reprocessing for substance use disorders: a meta-analysis of addiction-related and emotional symptoms.
Synthesis in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This meta-analysis identified the effects of EMDR on both addiction-related symptoms (e.g., craving, addiction severity) and comorbid emotional symptoms (e.g., posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, anxiety), and the influence of moderator variables across these symptom domains in substance use disorders (SUDs). Methods: We systematically searched the literature published up to June 2025 through major databases including Cochrane, PubMed, Embase, and PsycINFO. A total of 14 studies were included in the final analysis, including randomized controlled trials (RCTs), randomized crossover studies, and quasi-experimental studies. The effect size was calculated using Hedges' g based on pre-to-post treatment changes, and a meta-analysis was conducted using a random-effects model. In addition, meta-regression and subgroup analyses were performed, focusing on moderator variables such as study design, intervention type, total session number, and participant characteristics. Results: The meta-analysis results showed that EMDR produced a significant treatment effect with moderate or higher effect sizes for craving (g = 0.55), PTSD (g = 0.69), depression (g = 0.64), and anxiety (g = 0.72) symptoms, and heterogeneity ranged from low to moderate. On the other hand, the effect on addiction severity was not significant (g = 0.14). The effect on craving showed significant differences depending on the diagnostic group of the participants (Alcohol/Drug Use Group vs. Nicotine Use Group) and the study design (RCT vs. non-RCT). Some studies observed a short-term effect of reducing craving, but the evidence supporting long-term treatment effects was limited. Conclusion: These findings suggest that EMDR may be an effective intervention not only for emotional comorbid symptoms in individuals with SUD, but also for certain addiction-related symptoms, particularly in reducing craving. However, the quality of the included studies was generally low, and there was a lack of evidence regarding long-term effects. Future studies should employ more rigorous research designs, include sufficient sample sizes and long-term follow-up assessments, and perform detailed analyses that take into account intervention types and participant characteristics. Such research will help to clarify the therapeutic utility of EMDR and promote its practical application in addiction treatment settings. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251070837, identifier CRD420251070837.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.