Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41040940›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in psychiatry2025

Assessing suicide risk in patients with heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Yujia Zeng

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Yujia ZengBeijing Anzhen Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Heart failure (HF) is a long-lasting and challenging condition. It often relates to issues with mental health and suicidal behavior. However, the exact level of suicide risk in HF patients is not well understood. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the connection between HF and suicide risk in adults. Methods: PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched up to June 2025. The emphasis was on research that presented outcomes related to suicide in patients with heart failure. Included studies featured adults who were 18 years of age or older and reporting quantitative information, like odds ratios, about suicidal ideation, attempts, or completions. To explore heterogeneity, subgroup analyses were performed based on diagnostic criteria for suicidal behaviors (ICD-9 versus ICD-10) and study design. Results: Out of 1,643 records, 8 studies were eligible based on the criteria described. The pooled analysis showed a significantly higher risk of suicide in HF patients compared to the general population with no major cardiovascular diseases (OR = 1.62, 95% CI: 1.49-1.74) compared to healthy subjects, with substantial variability (I² = 88.23%). Subgroup analyses revealed that studies using ICD-9 criteria (OR = 1.75, 95% CI: 1.65-1.85) and case-control designs (OR = 1.75, 95% CI: 1.66-1.83) had significantly higher pooled suicide risk estimates than studies using ICD-10 criteria (OR = 1.46, 95% CI: 1.38-1.54) and cohort designs (OR = 1.46, 95% CI: 1.38-1.54). Furthermore, between-group differences were statistically significant (Q = 20.05 and 23.49, p < 0.001), suggesting that diagnostic criteria and study design were significant sources of heterogeneity. Conclusion: HF is connected to a significantly higher risk of suicide. These results emphasize the importance of regular mental health check-ups and early support in HF care, especially shortly after diagnosis.

Indexed as

heart failuremeta-analysispsychiatryself-injurysuicide

Identifiers

PMID41040940
PMCPMC12484135

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.