SynthesisFrontiers in psychiatry2025
Detecting electrophysiological alterations in psychiatric disorders through event-related microstates: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Event-related potentials (ERPs), recorded through electroencephalography (EEG) during sensory and cognitive tasks, have been consistently employed to investigate electrophysiological correlates of psychiatric disorders. However, traditional peak component analysis of ERPs is limited by the Methods: A systematic review of English-language articles indexed in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science (WoS) was conducted on May 1, 2024. Studies were included only if they applied microstate analysis to ERP data and analyzed data from at least one group of patients with psychiatric disorders in comparison to healthy controls. Results: Of the 1,115 records screened, 17 studies were included in the final qualitative synthesis. The majority of these studies (n=8) included patients with schizophrenia, using various tasks focusing mainly on visuospatial processing (n=6) and face processing (n=6). Regarding the microstate methodology, the primary clustering approach employed was the k-means clustering algorithm (n=8), while the cross-validation criterion (n=10) was the most commonly used measure of fit. Sixteen of the 17 studies reported at least one significant difference in microstate features between patients and healthy controls, mainly in the temporal and topographic characteristics of microstates and the sequence of their occurrence. Conclusions: This review highlights the value of event-related potential microstates analysis in identifying spatiotemporal alterations in brain dynamics associated with psychiatric disorders. However, the limited number of studies and the heterogeneity of experimental paradigms constrain the generalizability of the findings. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO, identifier CRD42024529185.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.