ReviewJournal of the advanced practitioner in oncology2025
Understanding the Role and Clinical Management of Bridging Therapy During CAR T-Cell Therapy for Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma.
Review in Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- IMMPACT-MM: Insights into Multiple Myeloma Patient Outcomes following Early-Line Cilta-cel Treatment.Oncology and therapy · 2026Article
- Cyclosporine in hematological disorders: mechanisms, clinical practice and emerging advances.Annals of hematology · 2026Review
- Optimizing ciltacabtagene autoleucel outcomes: real-world experience and best practices from a single academic center.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has emerged as a highly effective treatment for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM). However, manufacturing CAR T cells can take 3 to 4 weeks, leaving patients vulnerable to disease progression during this waiting period. Bridging therapy aims to address this gap by controlling disease and improving CAR T-cell efficacy. Objectives: This review summarizes the role of bridging therapy in CAR T-cell therapy for MM, focusing on the rationale and goals of bridging therapy, timing of initiation, infection risk management, selection of bridging regimens, and clinical implications, including patient education and communication. Methods: Relevant literature on CAR T-cell therapy and bridging therapy in MM was reviewed, including clinical trials and real-world data. Findings: Bridging therapy may be crucial for some patients, particularly for those with rapidly progressive disease. The optimal timing for initiating bridging therapy remains under investigation, but it can begin as soon as leukapheresis is completed. Prophylactic antibiotics or antivirals and close monitoring are essential for preventing infections during this period. The choice of bridging regimen depends on individual patient characteristics and prior therapies. Effective patient education and communication between local oncology teams and CAR T-cell centers are critical. Implications: Bridging therapy plays a vital role in optimizing CAR T-cell therapy outcomes for MM patients. Further research is needed to define the optimal use of bridging therapy in this evolving treatment landscape.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.