Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41040913›Full record

ArticleOncology letters2025

Preoperative C-reactive protein-albumin-lymphocyte index predicts survival outcomes in patients with stage I-III colorectal cancer: A retrospective cohort study.

Jinquan Li, Xiaosheng Hu, Shanzhong Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncology letters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Nutritional prehabilitation strategies in abdominal surgery.Current opinion in clinical nutrition and metabolic care · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jinquan LiDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Jingdezhen First People's Hospital, Jingdezhen, Jiangxi 333000, P.R. China.
Xiaosheng HuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Jingdezhen First People's Hospital, Jingdezhen, Jiangxi 333000, P.R. China.
Shanzhong ZhangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Jingdezhen First People's Hospital, Jingdezhen, Jiangxi 333000, P.R. China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a major cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. The present study aimed to investigate the value of the preoperative C-reactive protein-albumin-lymphocyte (CALLY) index in predicting recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) rates in patients with stage I-III CRC. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 255 patients with stage I-III CRC who underwent radical resection. The optimal cutoff value of the CALLY index was determined by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, and patients were stratified into high- and low-CALLY groups accordingly to assess its prognostic value for RFS and OS. The CALLY index had an area under the curve of 0.739 for predicting CRC prognosis. With a cutoff value of 6.790, patients in the high-CALLY group exhibited significantly better RFS and OS rates compared with those in the low-CALLY group. Multivariate Cox regression analysis confirmed CALLY as an independent prognostic factor. In conclusion, the preoperative CALLY index is an effective prognostic biomarker for predicting RFS and OS rates in patients with stage I-III CRC, demonstrating potential clinical utility.

Indexed as

colorectal cancerC-reactive protein-albumin-lymphocyte indexprognostic

Identifiers

PMID41040913
PMCPMC12486370

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.