Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41040912›Full record

ArticleOncology letters2025

Identification of key molecules in micropapillary progression of lung adenocarcinoma: A comprehensive gene expression analysis study using the spatial gene expression solution methodology.

Mai Matsumura, Hideaki Mitsui, Tetsukan Woo, Takehisa Suzuki, Hiromasa Arai, Chihiro Koike, Toshiaki Kataoka, Daisuke Motooka, Kiyoharu Fukushima, Koji Okudela

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncology letters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Mai MatsumuraDepartment of Pathology, Saitama Medical University, Moroyama-cho, Saitama 350-0495, Japan.
Hideaki MitsuiDepartment of Pathology, Yokohama City University, School of Medicine, Yokohama, Kanagawa 236-0004, Japan.
Tetsukan WooDepartment of General Thoracic Surgery, Yokohama City University Medical Center Hospital, Yokohama, Kanagawa 232-0024, Japan.
Takehisa SuzukiDepartment of Pathology, Yokohama City University, School of Medicine, Yokohama, Kanagawa 236-0004, Japan.
Hiromasa AraiDepartment of Surgery, Kanagawa Prefectural Cardiovascular and Respiratory Center Hospital, Yokohama, Kanagawa 236-0051, Japan.
Chihiro KoikeDepartment of Pathology, Saitama Medical University, Moroyama-cho, Saitama 350-0495, Japan.
Toshiaki KataokaDepartment of Pathology, Saitama Medical University, Moroyama-cho, Saitama 350-0495, Japan.
Daisuke MotookaDepartment of Infection Metagenomics, Genome Information Research Center, Research Institute for Microbial Diseases, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan.
Kiyoharu FukushimaDepartment of Respiratory Medicine and Clinical Immunology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan.
Koji OkudelaDepartment of Pathology, Saitama Medical University, Moroyama-cho, Saitama 350-0495, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The micropapillary histological subtype is a high-grade element and a poor prognostic marker in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). This subtype develops through the lepidic-filigree micropapillary (filigree)-conventional/overt micropapillary (mPAP) pathway. The present study aimed to identify key molecules that promote this progression. To this end, gene expression profiles specific to lepidic, filigree and mPAP elements were investigated in histological sections obtained from 4 different LUAD cases. The 10× Genomics Visium Spatial Gene Expression Solution was used due to its superior resolution compared with conventional microdissection techniques. Cellular retinoic acid binding protein 2 (CRABP2), carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecule 5 (CEACAM5) and mucin 21 (MUC21) were identified as common molecules with significantly elevated levels along the lepidic-filigree-mPAP pathway. Furthermore, the present findings indicated that CRABP2 may serve an important role in the early stage of this process, as its level significantly increases during the transition from the lepidic to the filigree substage. Immunohistochemical analysis of the expression of CRABP2, CEACAM5 and MUC21 proteins in 207 surgically resected LUAD samples (expanded sample size) was performed. The present study revealed an increase in the expression levels of CRABP2 between the lepidic and filigree elements, and between filigree and mPAP for CEACAM5 and MUC21. Thus, these three proteins were demonstrated to serve roles in the lepidic-filigree-mPAP pathway at different stages. Notably, these molecules were associated with poor prognosis, characterized by an elevated recurrence rate and poor survival rate. In conclusion, crucial molecules that promote the lepidic-filigree-mPAP pathway, and exhibit potential clinical utility as prognostic markers and molecular therapeutic targets, were identified.

Indexed as

filigreelung adenocarcinomamicropapillary histologyprognosisprogression

Identifiers

PMID41040912
PMCPMC12486367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.