ReviewInternational journal of women's health2025
Research Trends and Hotspots in Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery: A Bibliometric and Visualization Analysis.
Review in International journal of women's health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effectiveness of Simulation-Based Gynecologic Endoscopy Training: A Systematic Review Comparing Objective Technical Skill Performance.International journal of women's health · 2026Review
- Editorial: 10th anniversary of frontiers in surgery: celebrating progress and envisioning the future of multidisciplinary surgery.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Minimally invasive gynecologic surgery (MIGS) has changed gynecologic care over the past thirty years by introducing techniques like multiport laparoscopy, robotic-assisted laparoscopy, and single-site surgery. MIGS offers advantages like reduced blood loss, shorter recovery times, and comparable oncological outcomes to open surgery. However, existing literature lacks a systematic synthesis of global research trends and academic performance of researchers. This cross-sectional bibliometric analysis examined 5,379 MIGS-related publications indexed in the Web of Science Core Collection database spanning 2014 to 2023, utilizing tools like VOSviewer and CiteSpace to map academic trends. The study revealed global contributions from 1,888 institutions across 97 countries, with the United States (1,156 publications) and China (1,090 publications) emerging as leading contributors. High-income countries dominated research output, though metrics varied regionally. Key institutions driving innovation included Mayo Clinic (n = 97), Harvard Medical School (n = 87), and Brigham & Women's Hospital (n = 83). Journal performance showed disparities influenced by impact factors, accessibility, and editorial focus, while research hotspots centered on endometriosis, laparoscopy, and hysteroscopy. The findings highlight a dynamic, collaborative global landscape in MIGS research, with disease prevalence and journal specialization shaping academic priorities. This analysis underscores the field's evolution and anticipates future directions, emphasizing the role of multidisciplinary collaboration and technological advancements in advancing clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.