Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41040810›Full record

ArticleOpen research Europe2024

Refined and benchmarked homemade media for cost-effective, weekend-free human pluripotent stem cell culture.

Lukasz Truszkowski, Sveva Bottini, Sara Bianchi, Mirko G Scrivano, Giulia Ferrari Ramondo, Linda Belluci, Helen Bell, Silvia Becca, Kirsten E Snijders, Giulia Savorè and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open research Europe, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Lukasz Truszkowski *Department of Molecular Biotechnology and Health Sciences, Molecular Biotechnology Center "Guido Tarone", University of Turin, Torino, 10126, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7816-6092
Sveva Bottini *Department of Molecular Biotechnology and Health Sciences, Molecular Biotechnology Center "Guido Tarone", University of Turin, Torino, 10126, Italy.
Sara BianchiDepartment of Molecular Biotechnology and Health Sciences, Molecular Biotechnology Center "Guido Tarone", University of Turin, Torino, 10126, Italy.
Mirko G ScrivanoDepartment of Life Sciences and Systems Biology, Molecular Biotechnology Center "Guido Tarone",, University of Turin, Torino, 10126, Italy.
Giulia Ferrari RamondoSan Raffaele Telethon Institute for Gene Therapy, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, 20132, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-0976-3153
Linda BelluciDepartment of Life Sciences and Systems Biology, Molecular Biotechnology Center "Guido Tarone",, University of Turin, Torino, 10126, Italy.
Helen BellQkine, Cambridge, UK.
Silvia BeccaDepartment of Molecular Biotechnology and Health Sciences, Molecular Biotechnology Center "Guido Tarone", University of Turin, Torino, 10126, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-4918-1133
Kirsten E SnijdersDepartment of Molecular Biotechnology and Health Sciences, Molecular Biotechnology Center "Guido Tarone", University of Turin, Torino, 10126, Italy.
Giulia SavorèDepartment of Molecular Biotechnology and Health Sciences, Molecular Biotechnology Center "Guido Tarone", University of Turin, Torino, 10126, Italy.
Federica SozzaDepartment of Molecular Biotechnology and Health Sciences, Molecular Biotechnology Center "Guido Tarone", University of Turin, Torino, 10126, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-2405-769X
Irene RiccaDepartment of Molecular Biotechnology and Health Sciences, Molecular Biotechnology Center "Guido Tarone", University of Turin, Torino, 10126, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-5276-2035
Cristina RubinettoDepartment of Molecular Biotechnology and Health Sciences, Molecular Biotechnology Center "Guido Tarone", University of Turin, Torino, 10126, Italy.
Luana FerraraQkine, Cambridge, UK.
Francesco NeriDepartment of Life Sciences and Systems Biology, Molecular Biotechnology Center "Guido Tarone",, University of Turin, Torino, 10126, Italy.
Andrea DitadiSan Raffaele Telethon Institute for Gene Therapy, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, 20132, Italy.
Savatore OlivieroDepartment of Life Sciences and Systems Biology, Molecular Biotechnology Center "Guido Tarone",, University of Turin, Torino, 10126, Italy.
Elisa BalmasDepartment of Molecular Biotechnology and Health Sciences, Molecular Biotechnology Center "Guido Tarone", University of Turin, Torino, 10126, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4600-6809
Catherine EltonQkine, Cambridge, UK.
Alessandro BerteroDepartment of Molecular Biotechnology and Health Sciences, Molecular Biotechnology Center "Guido Tarone", University of Turin, Torino, 10126, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4919-9087

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Cost-effective, practical, and reproducible culture of human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs) is required for basic and translational research. Basal 8 (B8) has emerged as a cost-effective solution for weekend-free and chemically-defined hPSC culture. However, the requirement to home-produce some recombinant growth factors for B8 can hinder access and reproducibility. Moreover, we found the published B8 formulation suboptimal in widely-used normoxic hPSC culture. Lastly, the performance of B8 in functional applications such as genome editing or organoid differentiation required systematic evaluation. Methods: We formulated B8 with commercially available, growth factors and adjusted its composition to support normoxic culture of WTC11 human induced pluripotent stem cell line. We compared this formulation (B8+) with commercial Essential 8 (cE8) and a home-made, weekend-free E8 formulation (hE8). We measured pluripotency marker expression and cell cycle by flow cytometry, and investigated the transcriptional profiles by bulk and single-cell RNA sequencing. We further assessed genomic stability, genome editing efficiency, single-cell cloning, and differentiation in both monolayer and organoids. Finally, we validated key findings using male (H1) and female (H9) human embryonic stem cells. Results: hE8 performed comparably to cE8 across most functional assays and cell lines. In contrast, cells in B8+ displayed higher NANOG expression and improved genome editing efficiency. At the same time, B8+ led to gene expression changes indicative of marked lineage priming, reflected in altered morphology and differential response to some differentiation protocols. Both weekend-free media resulted in a modest transcriptional shift towards a less metabolically active state, consistent with intermittent media starvation. Conclusions: Homemade weekend-free media can provide a cost-effective alternative to commercial formulations. hE8, integrating some features of B8 while resembling cE8, emerges as a robust and practical option with limited compromises. B8+, though advantageous in some contexts, warrants caution due to lineage priming effects that may impact differentiation outcomes.

Indexed as

hiPSC; pluripotency; culture media; thermostable FGF2; TGF beta

Identifiers

PMID41040810
PMCPMC12488189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.