ArticleCureus2025
Evaluation of Intraocular Anti-vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) Drug-Associated Adverse Events Using Spontaneous Reporting Databases.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAnti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents are the first-line therapies for macular edema, diabetic macular edema, and exudative age-related macular degeneration secondary to retinal vein occlusion. Although adverse events, including cerebral infarction, are rare, their potential severity warrants further investigation. This study aimed to evaluate the risk and time to onset of adverse events, including cerebral infarction, associated with anti-VEGF agents using the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report (JADER) database.
methodsAdverse events were coded using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities, and reporting odds ratios were calculated. The number of reports and median time to onset (interquartile range) were determined. Survival analyses were performed employing the log-rank test and the generalized Wilcoxon test.
resultsFrom April 2004 to January 2025, 965,286 reports were included in the JADER database. The number of adverse event reports for aflibercept (IVA), ranibizumab (IVR), brolucizumab (IVB), and faricimab (IVF) was 1,217, 1,223, 1,064, and 199, respectively. Furthermore, the reported numbers of cerebral infarction cases associated with IVA, IVR, IVB, and IVF were 200, 154, 16, and 20, respectively. The median (interquartile range) time to onset of cerebral infarction associated with IVA and IVR was 79.0 (range: 28.0-274.0) days and 48.5 (range: 14.0-142.5) days, respectively, with a significant difference in the time trend (log-rank test: p = 0.0100 and generalized Wilcoxon test: p = 0.0067).
conclusionThe findings suggest that cerebral infarction may develop earlier with IVR use than with IVA use and highlight the need for careful monitoring and individualized treatment strategies in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.