ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
Racial and Socioeconomic Fairness of Area-Level Traffic-Related Air Pollution Measure Aggregation.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: The Environmental Protection Agency's Environmental Justice Screen traffic proximity (EJ Screen) and the Department of Transportation's Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) commonly serve as proxies of traffic-related pollution exposure. However, the methods used to aggregate to area-level measures have been untested for bias. Methods: Using a parcel-level measured developed for Hamilton County, Ohio, agreement was determined with both above measures at three geographic levels: census block group, census tract and zip code tabulation area (ZCTA). Fairness was assessed using linear regression. Results: Generally, the values of AADT were in significant agreement with the parcel proximity measure while the EJ Screen was not. Racial and community deprivation bias was widely detected for EJ Screen. Discussion: While the biases detected were not directly against majority black and materially deprived neighborhoods, the biases could manifest in negative downstream effects. These manifestations include suppression of known traffic-related pollution effects in subsequent research. Impact Statement: The Environmental Protection Agency's Environmental Justice Screen traffic proximity (EJ Screen) and the Department of Transportation's Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) are widely used traffic related pollution proxies however, with common aggregation techniques largely untested for fairness, this research has detected potential biases in the EJ Screen product.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.