Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41040736›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025

Orthogonal validation of PD Biomarkers: Multi-platform proteomics profiling of CSF, Plasma, and Urine confirms DDC as a consistent candidate.

Ravindra Kumar, Aleksandra Beric, Daniel Western, Zining Yang, Wenjing Lin, Jigyasha Timsina, Carlos Cruchaga, Laura Ibanez

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ravindra KumarDepartment of Psychiatry, Washington University in Saint Louis School of Medicine.ORCID 0000-0002-0121-8402
Aleksandra BericDepartment of Psychiatry, Washington University in Saint Louis School of Medicine.ORCID 0000-0002-9351-585X
Daniel WesternDepartment of Psychiatry, Washington University in Saint Louis School of Medicine.ORCID 0000-0003-3725-9553
Zining YangDepartment of Psychiatry, Washington University in Saint Louis School of Medicine.
Wenjing LinDepartment of Psychiatry, Washington University in Saint Louis School of Medicine.
Jigyasha TimsinaDepartment of Psychiatry, Washington University in Saint Louis School of Medicine.ORCID 0000-0003-4794-9187
Carlos CruchagaDepartment of Psychiatry, Washington University in Saint Louis School of Medicine.
Laura IbanezDepartment of Psychiatry, Washington University in Saint Louis School of Medicine.ORCID 0000-0003-2381-7059

Funding

Smartphone-Based "Burst" Cognitive AssessmentsP01AG003991 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI JOHN MORRIS · 1985 to 2026
$69.5M
DIAN-TU Next Generation Prevention Trial - Data Request Management SupplementR01AG053267 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BATEMAN, RANDALL J · 2017 to 2023
$34.9M
Research Education ComponentP30AG066444 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Susan Lynn Stark · 2020 to 2026
$28.7M
USING QUANTITATIVE TRAITS TO IDENTIFY NOVEL GENES FOR ALZHEIMERS DISEASE AND OTHER COMPLEX TRAITSRF1AG053303 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI CLIMER, SHARLEE, CRUCHAGA, CARLOS · 2016 to 2020
$4.0M
GENETIC MODIFIERS OF CEREBROSPINAL FLUID TREM2 IN ALZHEIMER'S DISEASERF1AG058501 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI CRUCHAGA, CARLOS, PICCIO, LAURA · 2018 to 2018
$3.5M
IDENTIFYING RARE VARIANTS THAT INCREASE RISK FOR ALZHEIMER'S DISEASER01AG044546 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI CRUCHAGA, CARLOS · 2013 to 2017
$2.7M
Plasma Cell-Free RNA as Non-invasive Biomarker for NeurodegenerationR00AG062723 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI IBANEZ, LAURA · 2022 to 2024
$729k
NIA NIH HHS P01 AG003991NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066444NIA NIH HHS R00 AG062723NIA NIH HHS R01 AG044546NIA NIH HHS R01 AG053267NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG053303NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG058501
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: High throughput proteomics has enabled hypothesis free biomarker discovery. However, differences in sample sizes, biological fluid, and quantification technologies have limited replication and validation of the results, and studies on the cross-platform variability are lacking. Here, we present the first orthogonal validation across three platforms in Parkinson's disease (PD) to understand the technical and biological challenges of proteomic studies. Methods: We have leveraged publicly available proteomic data from cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), plasma, and urine within the Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative (PPMI) cohort, generated using SomaScan5K (CSF), mass spectrometry (MS; CSF, plasma, and urine), and Olink Explore (CSF and plasma). Across platforms, we compared 375 proteins that were consistently quantified. We performed differential abundance analysis comparing PD versus healthy controls followed by sensitivity analyses (mutation carriers, at-risk participants, longitudinal analyses) to further understand the findings. Results: In CSF, we found significant correlations between effect sizes from the 375 proteins quantified by SomaScan5K and MS ( Conclusions: Biologically, these findings add further evidence that DDC has strong potential as a biomarker. Methodologically, our findings emphasize that platform selection can introduce more variance than that originating from disease status, which limits the reproducibility across technologies. This highlights the challenges and importance of cross-platform validation in proteomic biomarker research, and the translation of those discoveries to the clinic.

Indexed as

BiomarkerMulti-fluidsMulti-platformNeurodegenerative diseaseOrthogonal validationParkinson’s diseaseProteomics

Identifiers

PMID41040736
PMCPMC12485981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.