Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41040735›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025

Robust Disease Prognosis via Diagnostic Knowledge Preservation: A Sequential Learning Approach.

Haresh Rengaraj Rajamohan, Yanqi Xu, Weicheng Zhu, Richard Kijowski, Kyunghyun Cho, Krzysztof J Geras, Narges Razavian, Cem M Deniz

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Haresh Rengaraj RajamohanCenter for Data Science, New York University, New York, NY 10011.ORCID 0000-0002-7926-9090
Yanqi XuCenter for Data Science, New York University, New York, NY 10011.ORCID 0009-0006-0744-4183
Weicheng ZhuCenter for Data Science, New York University, New York, NY 10011.
Richard KijowskiDepartment of Radiology, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York.
Kyunghyun ChoCenter for Data Science, New York University, New York, NY 10011.
Krzysztof J GerasCenter for Data Science, New York University, New York, NY 10011.
Narges RazavianDepartment of Radiology, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, 10016, USA.
Cem M DenizDepartment of Radiology, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, 10016, USA.

Funding

Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative - SupplementU01AG024904 · NIA · NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE RES &EDUC · PI WEINER, MICHAEL W · 2004 to 2015
$121.0M
NIA NIH HHS U01 AG024904
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate disease prognosis is essential for patient care but is often hindered by the lack of long-term data. This study explores deep learning training strategies that utilize large, accessible diagnostic datasets to pretrain models aimed at predicting future disease progression in knee osteoarthritis (OA), Alzheimer's disease (AD), and breast cancer (BC). While diagnostic pretraining improves prognostic task performance, naive fine-tuning for prognosis can cause 'catastrophic forgetting,' where the model's original diagnostic accuracy degrades, a significant patient safety concern in real-world settings. To address this, we propose a sequential learning strategy with experience replay. We used cohorts with knee radiographs, brain MRIs, and digital mammograms to predict 4-year structural worsening in OA, 2-year cognitive decline in AD, and 5-year cancer diagnosis in BC. Our results showed that diagnostic pretraining on larger datasets improved prognosis model performance compared to standard baselines, boosting both the Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (AUROC) (e.g., Knee OA external: 0.77 vs 0.747; Breast Cancer: 0.874 vs 0.848) and the Area Under the Precision-Recall Curve (AUPRC) (e.g., Alzheimer's Disease: 0.752 vs 0.683). Additionally, a sequential learning approach with experience replay achieved prognostic performance comparable to dedicated single-task models (e.g., Breast Cancer AUROC 0.876 vs 0.874) while also preserving diagnostic ability. This method maintained high diagnostic accuracy (e.g., Breast Cancer Balanced Accuracy 50.4% vs 50.9% for a dedicated diagnostic model), unlike simpler multitask methods prone to catastrophic forgetting (e.g., 37.7%). Our findings show that leveraging large diagnostic datasets is a reliable and data-efficient way to enhance prognostic models while maintaining essential diagnostic skills.

Identifiers

PMID41040735
PMCPMC12486016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.