Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41040678›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025

Optical Microscopy Predictions of Focal Recurrence in Glioblastoma.

Sanjeev Herr, Niels Olshausen, Melike Pekmezci, Jasleen Kaur, Youssef Sibih, Vardhaan Ambati, Katie Scotford, Amit Persad, Thiebaud Picart, Akhil Kondepudi and 7 more

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Sanjeev Herr
Niels Olshausen
Melike Pekmezci
Jasleen Kaur
Youssef Sibih
Vardhaan Ambati
Katie Scotford
Amit Persad
Thiebaud Picart
Akhil Kondepudi
Nancy Ann Oberheim-Bush
Albert Kim
Jacob Young
Mitchel S Berger
Madhumita Sushil
Todd Hollon
Shawn L Hervey-Jumper

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A hallmark of glioblastoma (GBM) is disease recurrence, which occurs in all patients despite tumor resection, radiation, and chemotherapy. A critical challenge in glioblastoma treatment is the management of recurrent disease, for which there is no standard of care. Predicting the location of glioblastoma recurrence may improve the efficiency of advanced-stage therapies. Here, we present an artificial intelligence (AI)-based model to predict the risk of unprocessed surgical tissues at initial resection. AI-informed label-free optical microscopy was used to generate a normalized tumor infiltration value (AI-infiltration) for whole-slide optical images of samples taken from resection cavity margins. These values, in combination with clinical, radiographic, and molecular variables, were used to build a predictive model of focal recurrence. In a cohort of 80 patients, comprising 367 samples and 133,454 unique images, glioblastoma infiltration was significantly higher in margin samples from recurrent tumors (p = 0.026) compared with those from non-recurrent tumors. A random forest (RF) machine learning classifier was able to predict site recurrence with an average area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 86.6% ± 10.0 for the training cohort and 80.3% (95% CI: 0.641-0.965) for the validation cohort. AI-infiltration was the strongest contributor to recurrence prediction, outperforming tumor molecular features. Model performance remained high regardless of tumor location, resulting in random forest model predictions of recurrence at 5 and 10 millimeters of each sampled site. These findings represent the potential of AI to predict sites of tumor recurrence, thereby improving accessibility to targeted, precision, multimodal therapy for the highest-risk areas of disease.

Identifiers

PMID41040678
PMCPMC12486048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.