ReviewFrontiers in surgery2025
The uncertain fate of a wandering appendicolith: personal experience and literature review.
Review in Frontiers in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Post-Appendectomy Intra-Abdominal Abscess in Children with Perforated Appendicitis: A Narrative Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Hepatic Abscess Secondary to a Retained Appendicolith Following Perforated Appendicitis: A Case Report.Cureus · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Retained appendicoliths are an uncommon but clinically relevant complication of appendectomy, particularly in cases of perforated appendicitis. Migration of the appendicolith into the peritoneal cavity or liver may lead to persistent or recurrent abscess formation. Case description: We present the case of a 29-year-old male with recurrent hepatic abscesses following laparoscopic appendectomy. Initial CT and MRI imaging revealed calcified components within the liver consistent with a migrated appendicolith. Despite percutaneous drainage and antibiotic therapy, the patient experienced relapse. Definitive resolution was achieved through laparoscopic hepatic resection and removal of the retained appendicolith. Discussion: This case highlights the diagnostic challenges and potential complications associated with retained appendicoliths. Imaging plays a crucial role in identification and management. While conservative approaches may be attempted, surgical retrieval is often required to prevent recurrent infections. Conclusion: Retained appendicoliths should be considered in the differential diagnosis of hepatic abscesses following appendectomy. Timely diagnosis and complete removal are essential to avoid long-term morbidity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.