ArticleEuropean urology open science2025
An International Delphi Consensus About Tumor Rupture During Robotic Partial Nephrectomy (Researching UnPredictable TUmor RupturE during Robotic Partial Nephrectomy-The RUPTURE Project).
Article in European urology open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Oncological Results After Accidental Tumor Incision During Partial Nephrectomy.European urology open science · 2026Article
- Tumor Rupture During Partial Nephrectomy: More Questions than Answers.European urology open science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
37 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background and objective: Tumor rupture during robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) poses oncological risks, including potential malignant cell spread and recurrence. Despite these risks, standardized guidelines for defining, managing, and assessing risk factors of tumor rupture in RAPN are lacking. This Delphi consensus study aimed to frame the definition, risk factors, and oncological implications of tumor rupture in RAPN, as well as to propose management strategies. Methods: Using a modified Delphi method, a steering committee from multiple urological societies (the RUPTURE project) led a consensus-building study that followed the ACcurate COnsensus Reporting Document (ACCORD) checklist. A panel of international experts participated in a two-phase Delphi survey, rating their agreement with statements on tumor rupture, risk factors, and management in RAPN. Consensus was defined as ≥70% agreement, with unresolved statements discussed in an online meeting and subjected to a second voting round. Key findings and limitations: Thirty-three experts evaluated 58 statements. Consensus was reached on 33% of statements in the first round and 37.5% in the second round. Tumor rupture was defined, with risk factors including larger tumor size, complexity, and endophytic growth patterns. Recommended management strategies focused on minimizing tumor spillage by suctioning-rather than grasping-the cancerous tissue, and promptly securing the specimen in an endobag. Routine conversion to radical nephrectomy was not advised unless unresectable tumor remnants were found. Tumor rupture was not linked to distant metastasis, although its oncological impact varied by the rupture extent (ie, gross rupture vs focal; tumor spilled out macroscopically completely removed vs not). Conclusions and clinical implications: This consensus forms a basis for future research on tumor rupture in RAPN, emphasizing standardized definitions and uniform management strategies. Empirical validation through future clinical research is warranted. Patient summary: This research looks at tumor rupture during robotic kidney surgery, which can happen but is rare. The study involved a panel of experts who discussed finding a consensus on when it is more likely to occur and how to manage it effectively to reduce risks. It was also emphasized that while a rupture may not always lead to cancer spreading, the impact on a patient's health can vary and is yet to be determined.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.