Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41040661›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in genetics2025

Genomic prediction powered by multi-omics data.

Osval A Montesinos-López, Abelardo Montesinos-López, Brandon Alejandro Mosqueda-González, Iván Delgado-Enciso, Moises Chavira-Flores, José Crossa, Susanne Dreisigacker, Jin Sun, Rodomiro Ortiz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Prediction of disease resilience of pigs using multi-omics data.Journal of animal science and biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Osval A Montesinos-LópezFacultad de Telemática, Universidad de Colima, Colima, Mexico.
Abelardo Montesinos-LópezCentro Universitario de Ciencias Exactas e Ingenierías (CUCEI), Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico.
Brandon Alejandro Mosqueda-GonzálezInstitut National des Sciences Appliquées de Lyon, Villeurbanne, France.
Iván Delgado-EncisoSchool of Medicine, University of Colima, Colima, Mexico.
Moises Chavira-FloresInstituto de Investigaciones en Matemáticas Aplicadas y Sistemas (IIMAS), Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Mexico City, Mexico.
José CrossaColegio de Postgraduados (COLPOS), Montecillos, Mexico.
Susanne DreisigackerInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Mexico.
Jin SunDepartment of Statistics, School of Science, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao, China.
Rodomiro OrtizDepartment of Plant Breeding at SLU, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomic selection (GS) has transformed plant breeding by enabling early and accurate prediction of complex traits. However, its predictive performance is often constrained by the limited information captured through genomic markers alone, especially for traits influenced by intricate biological pathways. To address this, the integration of complementary omics layers-such as transcriptomics and metabolomics-has emerged as a promising strategy to enhance prediction accuracy by providing a more comprehensive view of the molecular mechanisms underlying phenotypic variation. We used three datasets, each collected under a single-environment condition, which allowed us to isolate the effects of omics integration without the confounding influence of genotype-by-environment interaction. We assessed 24 integration strategies combining three omics layers: genomics, transcriptomics, and metabolomics. These strategies encompassed both early data fusion (concatenation) and model-based integration techniques capable of capturing non-additive, nonlinear, and hierarchical interactions across omics layers. The evaluation was conducted using three real-world datasets from maize and rice, which varied in population size, trait complexity, and omics dimensionality. Our results indicate that specific integration methods-particularly those leveraging model-based fusion-consistently improve predictive accuracy over genomic-only models, especially for complex traits. Conversely, several commonly used concatenation approaches did not yield consistent benefits and, in some cases, underperformed. These findings underscore the importance of selecting appropriate integration strategies and suggest that more sophisticated modeling frameworks are necessary to fully exploit the potential of multi-omics data. Overall, this work highlights both the value and limitations of multi-omics integration for genomic prediction and offers practical insights into the design of omics-informed selection strategies for accelerating genetic gain in plant breeding programs.

Indexed as

genomic selectionomics dataoptimal integrationplant breedingprediction accuracy

Identifiers

PMID41040661
PMCPMC12485622

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.