Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41040658›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in genetics2025

Rapid forensic ancestry inference in selected Northeast Asian populations: a Y-STR based attention-based ensemble framework for initial investigation guidance.

Kyo-Chan Koo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Kyo-Chan KooDepartment of Management Engineering, College of Science and Technology, Dankook University, Cheonan, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Rapid inference of ancestral origin fromDNA evidence is critical in time-sensitive forensic investigations, particularly during the initial hours when crucial investigative decisions must be made. Although comprehensive analyses using multiple genetic markers provide thorough results, they often require significant processing time and resources. Y-chromosome short tandem repeats (Y-STRs) exhibit population-specific allelic distributions that facilitate rapid analysis, making them particularly valuable for initial screening in forensic contexts. Methods: This study aims to enhance population classification accuracy using Y-STR profile analysis, with a particular focus on Northeast Asian populations that are often merged into a single group by commercial ancestry panels. We developed a machine learning architecture centered on an attention-based ensemble mechanism that incorporates three complementary algorithms: a One-vs-Rest Random Forest, XGBoost, and Logistic Regression, each configured to effectively manage imbalanced datasets. Results: Utilizing only Y-STR data, the model achieved an overall accuracy of 80%-81% and demonstrated high stability. Notably, the model effectively processes imbalanced datasets, generating reliable outcomes for rapid ancestry assessment in time-critical investigations. Discussion: By addressing a key limitation in commercial ancestry panels--their failure to differentiate among Northeast Asian subpopulations--this framework provides valuable preliminary guidance in forensic cases involving Asian individuals. Consequently, our approach enhances rapid screening capabilities, which can inform early-stage investigations while complementing subsequent, more comprehensive genetic analyses.

Indexed as

crime scene investigationdata imbalanceinitial ancestry inferencemachine learningNortheast Asian populationsrapid forensic screeningY-STR

Identifiers

PMID41040658
PMCPMC12485621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.