ArticleJournal of dental sciences2025
Performance of ChatGPT-4, Gemini, and DeepSeek-V3 on answering the multiple choice questions from Taiwan national dental technician licensing examinations and their self-learning abilities over a three-week period.
Article in Journal of dental sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- An evaluation of DeepSeek and healthcare professionals' Q&A capabilities in improving patient-family satisfaction in the ICU.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Performance of ChatGPT-4, Gemini, and DeepSeek-V3 in answering the prompt-engineered questions from the Taiwan National Dental Technician Licensing Examination over a three-week period.Journal of dental sciences · 2026Article
- Performance of ChatGPT-4, Gemini, and DeepSeek-V3 on English-translated questions from the Taiwan national dental Technician Licensing examination over a three-week period.Journal of dental sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/purpose: Large language models (LLMs) can help the students to learn specific dental subjects and thus can be used as educational support tools for dental students. This study evaluated whether LLMs could correctly answer the multiple-choice questions (MCQs) selected from the 2023 Taiwan national dental technician licensing examination (TNDTLE) and whether the LLMs had the self-learning ability to improve their performance on correctly answering the exam questions over a three-week period. Materials and methods: Three different LLMs, ChatGPT-4, Gemini, and DeepSeek-V3, were used to answer the 194 text-based MCQs selected from the 2023 TNDTLE and the initial accuracy rates (ARs) were recorded. The same process was performed one, two, and three weeks later and the subsequent ARs were also recorded. The initial and the subsequent overall ARs were compared to assess whether the three LLMs had the self-learning ability over time. Results: The initial overall ARs for ChatGPT-4, Gemini, and DeepSeek-V3 were 52.1 %, 57.2 %, and 69.6 %, respectively, indicating that DeepSeek-V3 outperforms ChatGPT-4 and Gemini. However, Gemini showed significant improvement in performance one week and three weeks later, but the ChatGPT-4 and DeepSeek-V3 showed no significant improvement in performance over time. Among the 9 different subjects of dental technology, Gemini showed notable progress in several subjects, ChatGPT-4 showed limited improvement, and DeepSeek-V3 remained stable overall. Conclusion: Without external prompts, Gemini demonstrates self-learning potential. DeepSeek-V3 shows stable performance but limited learning ability, while ChatGPT-4 exhibits minimal learning. For the improvement in self-learning ability over time, Gemini outperforms ChatGPT-4 and DeepSeek-V3.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.