Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41040605›Full record

ArticleJournal of dental sciences2025

Benchmarking multimodal large language models on the dental licensing examination: Challenges with clinical image interpretation.

Yuichi Mine, Shota Okazaki, Tsuyoshi Taji, Hiroyuki Kawaguchi, Naoya Kakimoto, Takeshi Murayama

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of dental sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yuichi MineProject Research Center for Integrating Digital Dentistry, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Shota OkazakiProject Research Center for Integrating Digital Dentistry, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Tsuyoshi TajiDepartment of Oral Biology & Engineering, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Hiroyuki KawaguchiDepartment of General Dentistry, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.
Naoya KakimotoDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Takeshi MurayamaProject Research Center for Integrating Digital Dentistry, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: /purpose: Large language models (LLMs) have been studied in text-based healthcare tasks, but their performance in multimodal dental applications has not yet been fully explored. This study evaluated the performance of four multimodal LLMs on dental licensing examination questions with both text-only and visually-based components. Materials and methods: Four multimodal LLMs, ChatGPT-4o (4o), OpenAI o1 (o1), Claude 3.5 Sonnet (Sonnet), and Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking Experimental (Gemini), were tested on 353 questions from the 2024 Japanese National Dental Examination, including 204 text-only and 149 visually-based questions spanning 17 dental specialties. A zero-shot approach was used without prompt engineering. Performance was analyzed using Cochran's Q test and McNemar's test with Bonferroni correction. Results: o1 achieved the highest overall correct response rate (81.9 %), followed by Sonnet (71.7 %), Gemini (66.6 %), and 4o (65.7 %). All models performed significantly better on text-only questions (79.9-92.2 %) than on visually-based questions (45.6-67.8 %). Performance varied by specialty, with highest scores in basic medical sciences (Dental pharmacology: 100 %; Oral physiology: 86.7-100 %) and lower scores in clinical specialties requiring visual interpretation (Orthodontics: 36.4-66.7 %). Conclusion: Multimodal LLMs demonstrate promising performance on dental examination questions, particularly in text-based scenarios, but significant challenges remain in complex visual interpretation. The remarkable zero-shot performance of newer models such as o1 suggests potential applications in dental education and certain aspects of clinical decision support, although further advances are needed before reliable application in visually complex diagnostic workflows.

Indexed as

ChatGPT-4oClaude 3.5 sonnetGemini 2.0 flash thinking experimentalImage recognitionMultimodal large language modelsOpenAI o1

Identifiers

PMID41040605
PMCPMC12485424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.