ArticleJournal of dental sciences2025
Benchmarking multimodal large language models on the dental licensing examination: Challenges with clinical image interpretation.
Article in Journal of dental sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Periodontitis Risk Assessment and Prevention Planning: Comparative Study of Multimodal Large Language Models and Periodontist Evaluations.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Diagnostic and localization performance of multimodal large language models in the interpretation of dental periapical radiographs.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Assessing diagnostic performance of multimodal LLMs and a custom convolutional neural network in tooth-level caries detection and localization.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Generative Artificial Intelligence-driven orthodontic education practices.BMC medical education · 2026Review
- What the performance of multimodal LLMs on a national licensing exam teaches us about occupational therapy education.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Challenges and Limitations of Multimodal Large Language Models in Interpreting Pediatric Panoramic Radiographs.International journal of paediatric dentistry · 2026Article
- Analysis of multimodal large language models on visually-based questions in the Japanese National Examination for Dental Hygienists: A preliminary comparative study.Journal of dental sciences · 2026Article
- Performance of ChatGPT-4, Gemini, and DeepSeek-V3 in answering the prompt-engineered questions from the Taiwan National Dental Technician Licensing Examination over a three-week period.Journal of dental sciences · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence-powered chatbots' responses to orthodontic questions from the dentistry specialization examination: Accuracy and source evaluation.Journal of dental sciences · 2026Article
- Performance of ChatGPT-4, Gemini, and DeepSeek-V3 on English-translated questions from the Taiwan national dental Technician Licensing examination over a three-week period.Journal of dental sciences · 2026Article
- Performance of ChatGPT-4, Gemini, and DeepSeek-V3 on answering the multiple choice questions from Taiwan national dental technician licensing examinations and their self-learning abilities over a three-week period.Journal of dental sciences · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: /purpose: Large language models (LLMs) have been studied in text-based healthcare tasks, but their performance in multimodal dental applications has not yet been fully explored. This study evaluated the performance of four multimodal LLMs on dental licensing examination questions with both text-only and visually-based components. Materials and methods: Four multimodal LLMs, ChatGPT-4o (4o), OpenAI o1 (o1), Claude 3.5 Sonnet (Sonnet), and Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking Experimental (Gemini), were tested on 353 questions from the 2024 Japanese National Dental Examination, including 204 text-only and 149 visually-based questions spanning 17 dental specialties. A zero-shot approach was used without prompt engineering. Performance was analyzed using Cochran's Q test and McNemar's test with Bonferroni correction. Results: o1 achieved the highest overall correct response rate (81.9 %), followed by Sonnet (71.7 %), Gemini (66.6 %), and 4o (65.7 %). All models performed significantly better on text-only questions (79.9-92.2 %) than on visually-based questions (45.6-67.8 %). Performance varied by specialty, with highest scores in basic medical sciences (Dental pharmacology: 100 %; Oral physiology: 86.7-100 %) and lower scores in clinical specialties requiring visual interpretation (Orthodontics: 36.4-66.7 %). Conclusion: Multimodal LLMs demonstrate promising performance on dental examination questions, particularly in text-based scenarios, but significant challenges remain in complex visual interpretation. The remarkable zero-shot performance of newer models such as o1 suggests potential applications in dental education and certain aspects of clinical decision support, although further advances are needed before reliable application in visually complex diagnostic workflows.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.