ArticleJournal of dental sciences2025
Innovative 3D-printed dental teaching model for root canal treatment simulation.
Article in Journal of dental sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/purpose: Effective endodontic education requires realistic models for simulating clinical procedures, particularly working length (WL) determination using electronic apex locators (EALs). Traditional training methods using extracted or plastic teeth lack standardization, realism, and compatibility with EALs. This study aimed to develop and evaluate a 3D-printed tooth model with conductive properties that allows realistic and standardized training in EAL-based WL determination. Materials and methods: Custom 3D-printed teeth with two distinct working lengths (20.0 mm and 21.9 mm) were designed using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and 3D scanning. Each tooth was embedded in two types of conductive media-tap water and saline. Thirty-six participants (students, trainees, and instructors) performed WL measurements using the Root ZX mini EAL. Accuracy was defined as measurements within ±0.5 mm of the true WL. Results: The model demonstrated high reproducibility across user groups and media. Instructors achieved perfect accuracy (100 %), trainees ranged from 87.5 % to 100 %, and students demonstrated acceptable but more variable accuracy (86.7 %). No significant differences in measurement outcomes were observed between the two media ( Conclusion: This novel 3D-printed model simulates realistic root canal anatomy and conductive conditions for effective EAL training. It distinguishes varying proficiency levels and provides a reproducible, standardized platform for preclinical education. The model bridges the gap between theoretical learning and clinical practice, making it a valuable tool for contemporary endodontic training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.