ArticleJournal of dental sciences2025
Evaluating the impact of orthognathic surgery on mental health, function, and quality of life.
Article in Journal of dental sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Chronic pain after orthognathic surgery: a retrospective single-center study.Journal of oral & facial pain and headache · 2026Article
- Facial Contouring in Orthognathic Surgery: The Role of Facial Implants.Craniomaxillofacial trauma & reconstruction · 2026Review
- Individualized perioperative nutritional management in orthognathic surgery: an evidence-graded, integrated framework linking upper-airway change, feeding function, and psychological status.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/Purpose: Prior research highlights the psychological burden of facial deformities, yet there remains a lack of evidence regarding which postoperative variables most strongly influence mental well-being. This study explored the relationship between psychological status, physical function, and quality of life in patients with craniofacial malocclusion undergoing orthognathic surgery, aiming to identify predictors of psychiatric referral and patient satisfaction. Materials and methods: A retrospective, single-center study was conducted at Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, reviewing 60 de-identified medical records of patients who received orthognathic surgery between 2019 and 2024. Variables assessed included pain, oral function, anxiety, depression, body image, facial satisfaction, and quality of life, using validated scales. Spearman correlation analyses were used, followed by binary logistic regression with psychiatric referral as the outcome variable. Results: Significant correlations were found between oral function and depression (negative), and between oral function and mood disturbance (positive). Quality of life was significantly associated with emotional stability, while facial satisfaction was positively correlated with self-image. Logistic regression analysis identified facial satisfaction as a significant negative predictor of psychiatric referral (OR = 0.64, 95 % CI: 0.45-0.92, Conclusion: Orthognathic surgery exerts a multifaceted impact on patients' emotional well-being, self-perception, and life quality. Postoperative functional and aesthetic improvements are associated with improved psychological outcomes, especially self-image and emotional stability. Among various predictors, patient satisfaction with facial appearance and function was the strongest factor in reducing psychiatric referral needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.