ArticleJournal of dental sciences2025
Influence of the coronavirus pandemic on domiciliary dental care and associated problems in Japan -a questionnaire study.
Article in Journal of dental sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/purpose: The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic had a major impact on many patients receiving domiciliary dental care, and many services were suspended. This study aimed to assess the interruption of domiciliary dental care due to COVID-19 and the oral and general condition of patients whose care was interrupted. Materials and methods: We randomly selected 1500 dentists providing domiciliary dental care in the Tokyo area and mailed them a questionnaire about the impact of COVID-19 on domiciliary dental care. The questionnaire investigated the level of interruption in care, infection prevention measures, oral care status, the motivation and psychological state of dental staff, and oral and general condition of patients after domiciliary care was resumed. Results: We received 322 responses, a return rate of 21.4 %. Approximately one-third of domiciliary dental care was suspended during the pandemic. Overall, 20 %-35 % of patients (and their families) were infected with COVID-19, but infection among dental staff was very rare. Infection prevention was thorough when domiciliary dental care was provided, including the use of protective clothing and face shields. Approximately 4 % of respondents refrained from using turbine and ultrasonic scalers, which generate aerosols. About 40 % of respondents checked on patients' condition by phone or email. Conclusion: The percentage of domiciliary dental care suspended was lower than expected. Providers implemented practices to prevent infection, resulting in significant expenditure. The interruption of domiciliary dental care may have had a negative impact on patients' oral and general health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.